We are happy to announce that Living Internet is now part of BroadbandNow! Read here to find out more.

Alt Hierarchy History

Brian Reid, Usenet Backbone Administrator, Liberated Alt Hierarchy
Brian Reid

If an article
is received with a Newsgroups line listing some valid newsgroups and some invalid
newsgroups, a site should not remove invalid newsgroups from the list. Instead,
the invalid newsgroups should be ignored.

RFC 850; Standard for
Interchange of USENET Messages
; Mark Horton;
June 1983.

The alt hierarchy enables the Usenet community to exercise complete freedom of speech.

The issue of free speech and the Usenet have been intertwined from its creation, since the newsgroups were carried by a wide variety of military, academic, and corporate sites, each with their
own usage policies. In a bit of an Internet theme, like the similar development of mulitple IRC
networks
the establishment of the “alt.” category established a right to freedom
of
online expression
cuased by a reaction against over-control at the center.

The first attempt to control Usenet speech resulted in the creation of the “talk.*” hierarchy, where all controversial newsgroups and postings were supposed to be allocated. This wasn’t successful mainly because it was a controlled form of free speech. Someone could say what they wanted in the talk newsgroups, but the groups themselves were still controlled by the backbone administrators. Interestingly, with the increase in message traffic in the late 1990’s, the talk newsgroups saw a resurgence in use for the discussion of controversial subjects just as they were originally intended.

The introduction of genuine free speech on the Usenet began with the creation of
the “alt.” hierarchy, sparked by the creation of alt.sex.
The alt hierarchy
now
has
many more
newsgroups
than
any
other hierarchy. All other Usenet hierarchies require you to follow a definite
procedure
to create a
new group in that category. However, a newsgroup in the alt hierarchy
can be created by anyone. The resulting set of
newsgroups form a truly global democratic system, since each group in the alt
category
survives only if people show an interest in it.

The best description of the creation of the “alt.” category, is given by someone who was there – Brian Reid, as described below:

“The famous barbecue at which the alt net was created was held at G.T.’s Sunset Barbecue in Mountain
View California on May 7, 1987. John Gilmore and I were both unhappy with the decision making process of the ‘ordinary’ net. John was distressed because they
wouldn’t create rec.drugs, and I was distressed because they wanted to force me to adopt the name ‘rec.food.recipes’ for my recipe newsgroup. Gordon Moffett of
Amdahl also sat with us. He had no specific beef or goal, but he wanted to help. John’s home computer was ‘hoptoad’; my home computer was ‘mejac’. We set up a
link between us, and each of us set up a link to amdahl, and we vowed to pass all alt traffic to each other and to nurse the net along. In those days one sent
out numerous newgroup messages in the hopes that one would ‘take’; by the end of May the groups alt.test, alt.config, alt.drugs, and alt.gourmand were active.
At the time I also managed ‘decwrl’, so I quietly added ‘alt’ to the list of groups
that it carried.

Nearly
a year later, there was a vote taken about ‘soc.sex’ and although it passed, Gene
Spafford
refused to create it. I therefore created ‘alt.sex’ on April
3, 1988, and sent the following message to the USENET ‘backbone’ cabal:

 

From: reid@decwrl.dec.com
(Brian Reid)
Message-Id: <8804040154.AA01236@woodpecker.dec.com>
Date: 3 Apr 1988 1754-PST (Sunday)
To: backbone@purdue.edu, chiefdan@vax1.acs.udel.edu,
mejac!hoptoad!gnu@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: Re: soc.sex final results
In-Reply-To:
Gene Spafford / Sun, 03 Apr 88 18:22:36 EST.
<8804032322.AA15650@arthur.cs.purdue.edu>

To end the
suspense, I have just created alt.sex.
That meant that the alt network now
carried alt.sex and
alt.drugs. It was therefore artistically necessary to
create
alt.rock-n-roll, which I have also done. I have no idea what
sort of traffic it will carry. If the bizzarroids take it
over I will rmgroup
it or moderate it; otherwise I will let
it be.

Brian Reid
T5 (5th thoracic)

‘T5’
is the name of a vertebra (the 5th thoracic vertebra). This was my attempt to
remind these people that I was an official voting member of the backbone.

At
the time I sent that message I didn’t yet realize that alt groups were immortal
and couldn’t be killed by anyone. In retrospect, this is the joy of the alt network:
you create a group, and nobody can kill it. It can only die, when people stop
reading it. No artificial death, only natural death.

I don’t wish to offer an opinion about how the net should be run; that’s like offering
an opinion about how salamanders should grow: nobody has any control over it, regardless of what opinions they might have.”

– Brian Reid; in Hardy, Henry’s The History
of the Net
; 28 Sept 1993.