Best & Worst States for Broadband, 2026

Best & Worst States for Broadband, 2026

New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut rank best for broadband in 2026, while affordability still decides who gets connected.

Written by
August 5, 2026

133.7 Mbps

Average state median download — up 25% in one year

48 of 51

States at 100 Mbps median or better, up from 31

20

South Carolina’s fall — the steepest we’ve recorded

Executive Summary

Every year, our team analyzes broadband access, affordability, performance, and competition across all 50 states and Washington, D.C. to determine which states are leading and lagging in closing the digital divide. Each state is scored on six weighted factors: broadband availability, low-priced plan availability, fiber access, download speed, upload speed, and latency. For the 2026 edition, we analyzed over 160 million speed tests alongside our proprietary availability and pricing data covering every provider in the country.

Why It Matters

2026 is the year the ground starts breaking. With nearly all BEAD final proposals now federally approved and construction beginning across dozens of states, this report captures the clearest baseline yet of where American broadband stands before the largest infrastructure investment in the internet’s history reshapes the map. The headline is a paradox: network performance is improving faster than at any point since we began publishing this study, with average download speeds up 26% in a single year. Yet in the states at the bottom of our rankings, the barrier remains what it has always been: not whether a network exists, but whether anyone can afford to use it.

Key Findings


New Jersey is America’s best state for broadband for the second consecutive year.
The Garden State scored 97.4 out of 100, with perfect marks in all three network quality categories and low-priced plans available to 98.4% of households. Maryland, Connecticut, and Massachusetts round out the top four.

Alaska finishes dead last again.
Just 0.1% of Alaska households have access to a low-priced broadband plan, producing a 76.6-point affordability gap, by far the nation’s largest. Its 49.6 Mbps median download is also the slowest in the country. Montana, Idaho, and Kansas join it at the bottom of the rankings.

American internet speeds surged.
The national average of state median download speeds rose from 107.3 Mbps to 133.7 Mbps (+25%) year over year, and 48 of 51 states now post median downloads of 100 Mbps or better, up from just 31 last year.

The heartland is staging a comeback.
Iowa (up 15 spots), Louisiana (up 13), Missouri (up 12), and Indiana, Minnesota, and Vermont (each up 11) posted the year’s biggest gains, powered by fiber build-outs and major speed improvements.

South Carolina suffered the year’s steepest fall.
The state plunged 20 spots from #20 to #40, with Oregon (down 18 spots), Georgia (down 14), and Utah (down 13) close behind. Upload performance was the common culprit.

Fiber’s footprint expanded sharply.
Average state fiber coverage climbed from 49.7% to 56.6% of households, but fiber alone still doesn’t guarantee results. Kansas and Hawaii both have 74.6% fiber coverage and both sit in the bottom five.

The upload divide persists.
Eight states still post median upload speeds below 20 Mbps, the FCC’s minimum benchmark for broadband.

Provider consolidation is accelerating.
The average state lost roughly nine provider options year over year, from 70.8 to 62, led by Iowa (203 to 164) and Texas (197 to 159).

Interactive · Explore the 2026 rankings

Shade the map by any of six metrics. Darker crimson = better broadband.

Source: BroadbandNow Research, 2026

The Best and Worst States for Broadband in 2026

Top 10 Best States for Broadband

Rank State Score Grade 2025 Rank Key Strength
1 New Jersey 97.4 A 1 Perfect scores in all three network quality categories; 98.4% low-price plan access
2 Maryland 96.4 A 2 Perfect scores in every quality category, anchored by sub-10 ms latency
3 Connecticut 96.3 A 4 185.9 Mbps median download and 79.7% fiber coverage, highest of any top-10 state
4 Massachusetts 95.5 A 6 Highest wired/fixed wireless availability of any state (99.0%)
5 Delaware 95.1 A 3 Balanced excellence: 96.2% low-price access and perfect quality scores
6 New Hampshire 92.9 A 5 Fastest downloads in America (210.6 Mbps median)
7 Florida 92.6 A 9 Best big state w/ 166.3 Mbps median speeds and 91.9% low-price access
8 Illinois 92.2 A- 15 Sub-9 ms latency and a top-10 finish with just 39.6% fiber coverage
9 New York 91.9 A- 10 Lowest median latency in the nation (7.0 ms)
10 Texas 91.5 A- 7 Scale leader: 159 providers and 67.6% fiber across a massive footprint

Bottom 10 Worst States for Broadband

Rank State Score Grade 2025 Rank Key Challenge
51 Alaska 27.6 F 51 0.1% low-priced broadband access; a 76.6-point affordability gap
50 Montana 51.4 F 50 30-point affordability gap; only 53% can get a low-priced plan
49 Idaho 63.2 D 48 Below-average marks in every single category
48 Kansas 63.7 D 47 Slowest median download in America (58.4 Mbps) despite 74.6% fiber coverage
47 Hawaii 66.7 D 43 98.8 ms median round trip time, the worst latency in the nation
46 Wyoming 68.3 D+ 49 18-point affordability gap and 32.3 ms median latency
45 New Mexico 69.5 D+ 44 Just 25.3% fiber coverage, second-lowest in the U.S.
44 Oregon 71.9 C- 26 Fell 18 spots on weak uploads (23.6 Mbps) and rising latency
43 Arizona 72.2 C- 37 31.4% fiber coverage, third-lowest in the country
42 Ohio 72.9 C 38 Lowest median upload speed in the nation (15.6 Mbps)

New for 2026: We’ve refined our letter grades to include plus/minus distinctions, giving a more precise picture of where each state stands.

The States With the Biggest Rank Changes Since 2025

Biggest Climbers

State 2025 Rank 2026 Rank Change 2026 Grade
Iowa 31 16 ▲ 15 B
Louisiana 45 32 ▲ 13 C+
Missouri 30 18 ▲ 12 B
Minnesota 40 29 ▲ 11 C+
Vermont 42 31 ▲ 11 C+
Indiana 23 12 ▲ 11 A-

The Midwest broadband boom is real. Four of the six biggest climbers sit in America’s heartland, and the pattern behind their rise is consistent: aggressive fiber expansion meeting genuine speed gains. Iowa, long a case study in how provider quantity doesn’t equal quality, jumped 15 spots to #16 as its median download speed rose more than 50% year over year to 131.9 Mbps and fiber reached 69.9% of households. Missouri (up 12 spots to #18) and Indiana (up 11 to #12, cracking the A range) followed similar playbooks. Indiana’s leap into the top 15 stands out: at 62.3% fiber coverage and a 140.4 Mbps median download, it now outperforms several coastal states that have historically dominated our rankings.

Louisiana’s 13-spot climb to #32 is the most policy-relevant story in this year’s data. The first state in the nation to receive federal approval at multiple stages of the BEAD process, Louisiana has treated broadband as an economic development priority for years, and the early returns are now visible in the consumer experience, with median downloads up roughly 16% and uploads more than doubling since last year’s report.

Biggest Declines

State 2025 Rank 2026 Rank Change 2026 Grade
South Carolina 20 40 ▼ 20 C
Oregon 26 44 ▼ 18 C-
Georgia 24 38 ▼ 14 C
Utah 11 24 ▼ 13 B-
Tennessee 21 33 ▼ 12 C+
Rhode Island 8 19 ▼ 11 B

South Carolina’s 20-spot collapse is the largest single-year decline we’ve recorded in this study. The state’s availability numbers actually improved (95.6% of households can get broadband, and 87.1% can get a low-priced plan), but its network quality cratered relative to a rapidly improving country. At 18.6 Mbps, South Carolina’s median upload speed is now among the five worst in the nation, a critical weakness in an era of video calls, cloud backups, and remote work. Oregon (down 18) and Georgia (down 14) tell similar stories: in 2026, standing still means falling behind. The performance bar is rising so quickly that a state can improve in absolute terms and still tumble down the rankings.

“48 of 51 states now post median download speeds of 100 Mbps or better, up from just 31 last year.”

— BroadbandNow Research · Best & Worst States for Broadband, 2026

National Broadband Speeds Surged in 2026

The 2026 data captures the fastest single-year improvement in network performance we have measured:

  • Download speeds: The average state median jumped from 107.3 Mbps to 133.7 Mbps (+25%). Fourteen states now post median downloads above 150 Mbps; only three (Alaska, Kansas, and Hawaii) remain below 100 Mbps.
  • Upload speeds: The average state median rose from 25.9 Mbps to 31.8 Mbps (+23%). Nineteen states now earn perfect upload scores, up from the five that did so in last year’s report.
  • Latency: The average state median round trip time improved slightly from 23.7 ms to 23.2 ms, with seven states achieving perfect latency scores at under 10 ms: New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, Virginia, and Maryland.

The acceleration has many parents: multi-gig cable upgrades (notably DOCSIS 4.0 rollouts), continued fiber overbuilding in competitive metros, and consumers voting with their wallets for faster tiers. But it is unevenly distributed. New Hampshire’s 210.6 Mbps median download is more than four times faster than Alaska’s 49.6 Mbps, a gap between two American states that resembles the gap between different countries.

The Fastest and Slowest States for Broadband

  • Fastest median download: New Hampshire, 210.6 Mbps
  • Slowest median download: Alaska, 49.6 Mbps
  • Fastest median upload: North Dakota, 78.4 Mbps, thanks largely to its rural fiber cooperatives
  • Lowest latency: New York, 7.0 ms
  • Highest latency: Hawaii, 98.8 ms (geography is destiny for the islands’ undersea-cable-dependent connections)
  • Hidden speed champion: West Virginia posts the nation’s third-fastest median download (186.1 Mbps) yet ranks just 39th overall. For those who can get connected in the Mountain State, service is excellent; too many still can’t.

The States With the Largest Internet Affordability Gaps

For the second consecutive year, the defining divide in American broadband is not availability. It’s price. The affordability gap (the share of households who have broadband infrastructure available but no access to a low-priced plan) remains above 18 points in five states:

State % of Households With Broadband Available % of Households With a Low-Priced Plan Available Affordability Gap (percentage points)
Alaska 76.7% 0.1% 76.6 pts
North Dakota 99.2% 68.5% 30.7 pts
Montana 83.0% 53.0% 30.0 pts
South Dakota 95.2% 75.0% 20.2 pts
Idaho 91.8% 73.0% 18.8 pts

Alaska remains the starkest case in the nation: more than three-quarters of Alaska households technically have broadband available to them, yet almost none (one in a thousand) can purchase a plan we classify as low-priced. With the Affordable Connectivity Program now two years gone and no federal replacement in sight, the low-cost service option requirements attached to BEAD-funded networks represent the primary policy lever left for these states.

The geography of the affordability crisis is consistent: every state with an affordability gap above 18 points lies in the rural West or Great Plains, where sparse populations, long loop lengths, and thin competition keep prices structurally high.

Regional Broadband Trends: Northeast, Midwest, and West

The Northeast still owns the podium. For the second straight year, the top six states form a contiguous corridor of dense population, high incomes, and overlapping cable-versus-fiber competition along the Eastern Seaboard: New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Delaware, and New Hampshire.

The heartland is closing the gap. The Midwest and parts of the South produced nearly all of this year’s biggest climbers. Illinois (#8) cracked the top 10, the only Midwestern state to do so and a seven-spot jump from last year, while Indiana, Iowa, and Missouri all now sit in the top 20. Federal and state grant programs, electric co-op fiber builds, and aggressive telco fiber expansion are visibly moving the needle.

The Mountain West and Pacific are sliding. Nine of the bottom ten states lie west of the Mississippi; Ohio is the lone exception. Oregon’s 18-spot fall and Utah’s 13-spot fall stand out: both are states with strong tech-economy reputations whose consumer broadband experience is now measurably behind the national curve.

Why More Fiber Doesn’t Always Mean Better Broadband Rankings

Fiber coverage expanded more this year than in any year we’ve tracked, from 49.7% to 56.6% of households in the average state, yet our data continues to show that fiber deployment alone doesn’t guarantee better outcomes:

  • Kansas: 74.6% fiber coverage, ranks 48th — with the slowest median download in America
  • Hawaii: 74.6% fiber coverage, ranks 47th
  • Tennessee: 73.1% fiber coverage, ranks 33rd
  • North Dakota: 72.0% fiber coverage, ranks 26th

Meanwhile, states with modest fiber footprints continue to excel through robust cable (DOCSIS) and fixed wireless networks:

  • Illinois: 39.6% fiber coverage, ranks 8th
  • Nevada: 38.4% fiber coverage, ranks 20th
  • Washington: 35.9% fiber coverage, ranks 23rd

The lesson for the BEAD era, now formally technology-neutral following the 2025 program restructuring, is that what a network delivers matters more than what it’s made of. Deployment without adoption, and infrastructure without affordable pricing, don’t move the consumer experience.

Internet Provider Competition and Consolidation by State

The American ISP market is consolidating. The average state lost roughly nine provider options this year (70.8 → 62), with the steepest declines in historically fragmented markets: Iowa fell from 203 providers to 164, Texas from 197 to 159, and California from 148 to 129.

Our long-standing finding holds: There is no strong correlation between provider count and broadband quality. Iowa still has more providers than any state in the nation and ranks 16th; Connecticut ranks 3rd with just 16. Rhode Island earns a B with 13. What matters is not how many logos appear on a coverage map, but whether at least two capable networks genuinely compete for each household. If consolidation continues, and BEAD subgrant awards may accelerate it as larger players absorb smaller grantees, regulators should watch pricing power closely, particularly in the rural markets where the affordability gap is already most acute.

2026 vs. 2025 National Broadband Statistics

Metric 2026 National Avg 2025 National Avg Best (2026) Worst (2026)
Wired/Fixed Wireless Broadband Access (% of households) 93.4% 91.4% District of Columbia (99.8%) Alaska (76.7%)
Low-Priced Broadband Access
(% of households)
82.5% 81.4% District of Columbia (99.8%) Alaska (0.1%)
Fiber Coverage (% of households) 56.6% 49.7% District of Columbia (86.3%) Alaska (14.7%)
Median Download Speed 133.7 Mbps 107.3 Mbps New Hampshire (210.6 Mbps) Alaska (49.6 Mbps)
Median Upload Speed 31.8 Mbps 25.9 Mbps North Dakota
(78.4 Mbps)
Alaska (13.7 Mbps)
Median Latency (RTT) 23.2 ms 23.7 ms New York (7 ms) Hawaii (98.8 ms)
Provider Count 62 71 Iowa (164) Hawaii (11)

The Complete 2026 Rankings

Rank State Grade Score 2025 Rank Change Download (Mbps) Upload (Mbps) Latency, RTT (ms) % of Households With Fiber Access
1 New Jersey A 97.4 1 No change 164.8 37.8 7.6 66.6%
2 Maryland A 96.4 2 No change 163.7 40.3 9.8 65.2%
3 Connecticut A 96.3 4 ▲ 1 185.9 35.9 13.7 79.7%
4 Massachusetts A 95.5 6 ▲ 2 135.4 35.1 12.5 51.5%
5 Delaware A 95.1 3 ▼ 2 138.5 36.0 12.3 55.9%
6 New Hampshire A 92.9 5 ▼ 1 210.6 57.7 15.0 61.6%
7 Florida A 92.6 9 ▲ 2 166.3 34.3 12.7 59.9%
8 Illinois A- 92.2 15 ▲ 7 136.9 35.3 8.1 39.6%
9 New York A- 91.9 10 ▲ 1 156.0 30.0 7.0 66.6%
10 Texas A- 91.5 7 ▼ 3 147.6 39.3 12.0 67.6%
11 Colorado A- 91.2 16 ▲ 5 141.6 36.3 7.9 51.4%
12 Indiana A- 91.1 23 ▲ 11 140.4 38.5 13.2 62.3%
13 Pennsylvania A- 90.5 12 ▼ 1 143.4 32.4 15.3 56.6%
14 Virginia B+ 89.6 17 ▲ 3 128.3 37.5 9.6 65.6%
15 California B 86.3 13 ▼ 2 129.9 23.3 10.5 43.0%
16 Iowa B 85.7 31 ▲ 15 131.9 43.3 21.4 69.9%
17 District of Columbia B 85.1 14 ▼ 3 101.8 23.8 14.1 86.3%
18 Missouri B 84.5 30 ▲ 12 126.9 39.9 19.1 61.9%
19 Rhode Island B 84.4 8 ▼ 11 106.1 24.0 13.2 85.0%
20 Nevada B 84.1 22 ▲ 2 118.4 32.9 24.9 38.4%
21 Oklahoma B 83.2 28 ▲ 7 122.1 33.9 17.4 62.4%
22 Arkansas B 83.0 18 ▼ 4 179.8 62.2 21.2 62.4%
23 Washington B 82.8 25 ▲ 2 111.4 30.2 8.0 35.9%
24 Utah B- 81.0 11 ▼ 13 117.4 31.6 29.0 67.7%
25 Nebraska B- 81.0 27 ▲ 2 138.7 49.1 49.9 75.1%
26 North Dakota B- 80.7 19 ▼ 7 125.9 78.4 28.0 72.0%
27 Michigan C+ 79.0 29 ▲ 2 153.0 23.9 19.0 34.4%
28 Maine C+ 79.0 34 ▲ 6 166.7 28.7 28.9 53.6%
29 Minnesota C+ 78.8 40 ▲ 11 110.1 31.7 22.2 54.2%
30 South Dakota C+ 78.6 32 ▲ 2 173.6 30.5 28.4 60.1%
31 Vermont C+ 78.5 42 ▲ 11 138.6 28.1 21.0 60.5%
32 Louisiana C+ 78.5 45 ▲ 13 107.3 40.5 20.6 50.0%
33 Tennessee C+ 78.2 21 ▼ 12 129.2 24.3 34.2 73.1%
34 North Carolina C+ 78.1 36 ▲ 2 177.5 22.8 23.2 56.4%
35 Kentucky C+ 78.0 33 ▼ 2 151.2 32.8 34.9 65.9%
36 Alabama C+ 77.5 39 ▲ 3 139.5 35.0 34.4 57.1%
37 Mississippi C 77.3 35 ▼ 2 114.3 40.5 28.6 65.9%
38 Georgia C 76.9 24 ▼ 14 110.9 23.7 23.2 62.5%
39 West Virginia C 74.7 46 ▲ 7 186.1 32.5 19.8 36.2%
40 South Carolina C 73.9 20 ▼ 20 151.1 18.6 31.8 58.3%
41 Wisconsin C 73.2 41 No change 132.8 20.2 18.4 47.4%
42 Ohio C 72.9 38 ▼ 4 142.5 15.6 30.5 49.7%
43 Arizona C- 72.2 37 ▼ 6 117.3 19.5 24.3 31.4%
44 Oregon C- 71.9 26 ▼ 18 107.2 23.6 25.4 51.8%
45 New Mexico D+ 69.5 44 ▼ 1 104.4 23.8 20.7 25.3%
46 Wyoming D+ 68.3 49 ▲ 3 137.3 23.7 32.3 42.9%
47 Hawaii D 66.7 43 ▼ 4 86.5 16.3 98.8 74.6%
48 Kansas D 63.7 47 ▼ 1 58.4 17.9 25.5 74.6%
49 Idaho D 63.2 48 ▼ 1 101.9 19.6 29.9 41.8%
50 Montana F 51.4 50 No change 104.2 16.1 39.2 33.8%
51 Alaska F 47.6 51 No change 139.5 35.0 34.4 14.7%

All 51 states and Washington, D.C., ranked 0–100 based on availability, affordability, performance, and competition.

State-by-State Breakdown

Every state’s full 2026 report card, in rank order, featuring availability, pricing, performance, and competition.

A

New Jersey

Ranked #1 of 51 — vs 2025 · Back-to-back national champion

97.4

Overall / 100

Access
98.8%
Low-priced plan access
98.4%
Fiber availability
66.6%
Median download
164.8 Mbps
Median upload
37.8 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
7.6 ms

New Jersey (#1 – Score: 97.4 | Grade: A) successfully defends its title as the nation’s top broadband market in 2026, holding steady at #1 with near-universal connectivity. The Garden State represents the gold standard of our weighted prerequisite criteria, providing 98.8% of residents with basic wired or fixed wireless access and 98.4% with low-priced plan options. While its fiber-optic footprint expanded by +2.1 percentage points to reach 66.6%, New Jersey’s dominance is cemented by its M-Labs network performance: median download speeds surged by +27.6 Mbps over the past year to reach 164.8 Mbps, while median latency clocked in at a nation-best 7.6 ms, earning perfect quality scores across the board.

View 19 providers in New Jersey →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A

Maryland

Ranked #2 of 51 — vs 2025 · Elite East Coast performer

96.4

Overall / 100

Access
98.2%
Low-priced plan access
95.9%
Fiber availability
65.2%
Median download
163.7 Mbps
Median upload
40.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
9.8 ms

Maryland (#2 – Score: 96.4 | Grade: A) maintains its elite #2 national ranking in 2026, driven by intense marketplace competition across 41 active providers. The state excels in fundamental availability, delivering 98.2% wired or fixed wireless coverage and 95.9% low-priced plan access (up +0.6% from 2025). Maryland’s network quality is equally commanding across consumer speed evaluations, where median download speeds jumped by +34.8 Mbps to reach 163.7 Mbps alongside a nation-leading median upload speed of 40.3 Mbps. Supported by a 65.2% fiber-optic service footprint and a highly responsive median latency of 9.8 ms, Maryland remains a premier digital environment for competitive gamers, remote businesses, and streamers.

View 41 providers in Maryland →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A

Connecticut

Ranked #3 of 51 ▲ 1 · 2026 State Profile

96.3

Overall / 100

Access
98.5%
Low-priced plan access
97.8%
Fiber availability
79.7%
Median download
185.9 Mbps
Median upload
35.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
13.7 ms

Connecticut (#3 – Score: 96.3 | Grade: A) rises one position in 2026, overtaking Delaware to capture the #3 spot nationwide. This upward trajectory was powered by aggressive physical infrastructure buildouts, as fiber-optic service availability expanded by +4.9 percentage points to reach 79.7% of state residents (the highest fiber density in New England). This modern network architecture directly satisfied our prerequisite affordability and access criteria, with wired coverage reaching 98.5% and low-priced tier availability hitting 97.8%. Real-world performance followed suit, as median download speeds across M-Labs evaluations surged by +34.3 Mbps to reach an impressive 185.9 Mbps alongside a median round-trip latency of 13.7 ms.

View 16 providers in Connecticut →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A

Massachusetts

Ranked #4 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

95.5

Overall / 100

Access
99.0%
Low-priced plan access
97.6%
Fiber availability
51.5%
Median download
135.4 Mbps
Median upload
35.1 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
12.5 ms

Massachusetts (#4 – Score: 95.5 | Grade: A) climbs two spots in our 2026 rankings, moving up from #6 on the strength of near-universal baseline connectivity and expanding fiber networks. The Commonwealth delivers exceptional access prerequisites, leading the nation with 99% wired or fixed wireless availability and 97.6% access to low-priced broadband plans. While its 51.5% fiber-optic penetration trails regional leaders like Connecticut and Rhode Island, year-over-year fiber growth of +3 percentage points yielded noticeable performance gains. Across state speed test evaluations, Massachusetts residents experienced median download speeds of 135.4 Mbps (a +14.5 Mbps YoY gain), median upload speeds of 35.1 Mbps, and a low median latency of 12.5 ms.

View 29 providers in Massachusetts →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A

Delaware

Ranked #5 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile

95.1

Overall / 100

Access
98.2%
Low-priced plan access
96.2%
Fiber availability
55.9%
Median download
138.5 Mbps
Median upload
36.0 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
12.3 ms

Delaware (#5 – Score: 95.1 | Grade: A) slips two positions from #3 in 2025, yet remains comfortably entrenched in the top five nationwide with an outstanding Grade-A score. The First State continues to deliver robust access prerequisites, providing 98.2% of residents with basic wired coverage and 96.2% with budget-friendly plan options. Although Delaware’s median download speed dipped slightly by -3.1 Mbps to land at 138.5 Mbps, its overall quality metrics remain highly competitive. Supported by a 55.9% fiber-optic footprint (up +2.8% from 2025) and median upload speeds climbing to 36 Mbps, Delaware provides a stable, responsive network environment with a median latency of just 12.3 ms.

View 17 providers in Delaware →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

New Hampshire

Ranked #6 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile

92.9

Overall / 100

Access
96.2%
Low-priced plan access
94.1%
Fiber availability
61.6%
Median download
210.6 Mbps
Median upload
57.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
15.0 ms

New Hampshire (#6 – Score: 92.9 | Grade: A) shifts one spot down from #5 in 2025, but stands out as one of the fastest absolute speed markets in the United States. Fueled by a +7.4 percentage point surge in fiber availability (now reaching 61.6% of residents), New Hampshire generated a blistering median download speed of 210.6 Mbps, representing a massive +45.3 Mbps YoY jump and the highest state download median in our report. Median upload speeds saw an equally impressive +18.4 Mbps increase to reach 57.7 Mbps, while latency improved to 15.0 ms. The state’s overall standing is kept just outside the top five by its affordability prerequisite score, where low-priced plan access sits at 94.1%.

View 18 providers in New Hampshire →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Florida

Ranked #7 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

92.6

Overall / 100

Access
95.9%
Low-priced plan access
91.9%
Fiber availability
59.9%
Median download
166.3 Mbps
Median upload
34.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
12.7 ms

Florida (#7 – Score: 92.6 | Grade: A) advances two positions in 2026, rising from #9 to capture Grade-A status across a massive geographic footprint. The Sunshine State’s growth was driven by rapid physical infrastructure deployment, with fiber-optic availability surging by +9.3 percentage points over the past year to cover 59.9% of the population. This network expansion yielded significant performance gains across M-Labs dataset tests, where median download speeds climbed by +32.9 Mbps to reach 166.3 Mbps and median latency improved by -1.4 ms down to a responsive 12.7 ms. Combined with solid prerequisite metrics, including 95.9% wired availability and 91.9% low-priced plan access, Florida proves that large, diverse states can achieve elite connectivity benchmarks.

View 54 providers in Florida →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Illinois

Ranked #8 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile

92.2

Overall / 100

Access
96.1%
Low-priced plan access
88.5%
Fiber availability
39.6%
Median download
136.9 Mbps
Median upload
35.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
8.1 ms

Illinois (#8 – Score: 92.2 | Grade: A-) is one of the nation’s most impressive top-tier movers in 2026, leaping +7 spots upward from #15 to break into the top 10. This surge was catalyzed by significant network improvements that elevated its overall score by more than 12 points. While Illinois’s 39.6% fiber footprint remains relatively low compared to coastal leaders, a +6.3 percentage point expansion over 2025 levels drove major quality gains. Across state speed evaluations, median download speeds jumped by +31 Mbps to reach 136.9 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 35.3 Mbps, and round-trip latency sharpened to an elite 8.1 ms (the third-lowest latency in the country). Baseline availability also remains strong, with 96.1% wired coverage and 88.5% low-priced plan access.

View 97 providers in Illinois →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

New York

Ranked #9 of 51 ▲ 1 · 2026 State Profile

91.9

Overall / 100

Access
96.1%
Low-priced plan access
92.9%
Fiber availability
66.6%
Median download
156.0 Mbps
Median upload
30.0 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
7.0 ms

New York (#9 – Score: 91.9 | Grade: A-) moves up one position from #10 in 2025, combining high population density with exceptional network responsiveness. The Empire State excels in latency performance, generating a median round-trip time of just 7 ms, the lowest recorded latency of any state evaluated in our report. New York also strengthened its prerequisite foundation over the past 12 months, expanding basic wired coverage to 96.1% and increasing low-priced broadband availability by +0.7 percentage points to reach 92.9%. Supported by a 66.6% fiber-optic footprint, real-world consumer speed tests showed significant progress, with median download speeds jumping +36.5 Mbps to reach 156 Mbps and upload speeds rising to 30 Mbps.

View 58 providers in New York →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Texas

Ranked #10 of 51 ▼ 3 · 2026 State Profile

91.5

Overall / 100

Access
95.9%
Low-priced plan access
84.5%
Fiber availability
67.6%
Median download
147.6 Mbps
Median upload
39.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
12.0 ms

Texas (#10 – Score: 91.5 | Grade: A-) slips three positions from #7 in 2025, but maintains its position inside the top 10 through massive market competition and aggressive infrastructure buildouts. With nearly 200 active broadband providers operating statewide, Texas expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by a robust +8.8 percentage points year-over-year to reach 67.6% of residents. This ongoing modernization translated directly into higher consumer speeds, as median downloads increased by +24.2 Mbps to 147.6 Mbps and upload speeds climbed to 39.3 Mbps alongside a responsive median latency of 12.0 ms. While Texas scores highly in wired availability (95.9%), its overall ranking is constrained slightly by an 84.5% low-priced plan availability rate that trails Northeastern leaders.

View 159 providers in Texas →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Colorado

Ranked #11 of 51 ▲ 5 · 2026 State Profile

91.2

Overall / 100

Access
94.9%
Low-priced plan access
84.6%
Fiber availability
51.4%
Median download
141.6 Mbps
Median upload
36.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
7.9 ms

Colorado (#11 – Score: 91.2 | Grade: A-) climbs +5 positions in 2026, rising from #16 on the strength of rapid fiber deployment and outstanding latency performance. The Centennial State expanded its fiber-optic availability by +8.3 percentage points over the past year, bringing high-speed infrastructure to 51.4% of the population. This physical buildout yielded immediate quality improvements in M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds increased by +33.9 Mbps to reach 141.6 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 36.3 Mbps, and median latency sharpened to 7.9 ms, ranking among the top five lowest latency states nationwide. Colorado is anchored by 94.9% wired coverage, though an 84.6% low-priced plan access rate leaves room for affordability growth.

View 92 providers in Colorado →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Indiana

Ranked #12 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile

91.1

Overall / 100

Access
95.3%
Low-priced plan access
86.5%
Fiber availability
62.3%
Median download
140.4 Mbps
Median upload
38.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
13.2 ms

Indiana (#12 – Score: 91.1 | Grade: A-) registers one of the nation’s most dramatic upward surges in 2026, vaulting +11 spots from #23 and adding nearly 17 points to its overall score. This transformation was driven by across-the-board network modernization: fiber-optic service availability expanded by +7 percentage points to cover 62.3% of residents, while low-priced plan access rose to 86.5%. Real-world performance benchmarks improved drastically over 2025 levels, as median download speeds surged by +34.6 Mbps (reaching 140.4 Mbps) and median upload speeds jumped by +14.8 Mbps to hit 38.5 Mbps. Crucially, Indiana solved previous latency bottlenecks, improving its median round-trip time from 21.9 ms down to a responsive 13.2 ms.

View 94 providers in Indiana →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
A-

Pennsylvania

Ranked #13 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile

90.5

Overall / 100

Access
95.7%
Low-priced plan access
93.2%
Fiber availability
56.6%
Median download
143.4 Mbps
Median upload
32.4 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
15.3 ms

Pennsylvania (#13 – Score: 90.5 | Grade: A-) slips one spot from #12 in 2025, yet remains a strong, high-performing connectivity leader across the Mid-Atlantic. The Keystone State is anchored by solid prerequisite availability, providing 95.7% of residents with basic wired coverage and 93.2% with access to affordable, low-priced plans. Over the past 12 months, Pennsylvania expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +6 percentage points to reach 56.6% of the population. This ongoing fiber rollout drove solid performance gains across consumer speed evaluations, as median download speeds increased by +25.7 Mbps to 143.4 Mbps, upload speeds climbed to 32.4 Mbps, and median round-trip latency sharpened by -2.8 ms down to 15.3 ms.

View 74 providers in Pennsylvania →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B+

Virginia

Ranked #14 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile

89.6

Overall / 100

Access
90.7%
Low-priced plan access
83.0%
Fiber availability
65.6%
Median download
128.3 Mbps
Median upload
37.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
9.6 ms

Virginia (#14 – Score: 89.6 | Grade: B+) advances +3 positions in 2026, rising from #17 by combining expanding fiber coverage with exceptional network responsiveness. The Commonwealth increased its fiber-optic service footprint by +6 percentage points year-over-year, bringing high-speed infrastructure to 65.6% of state residents. Across M-Labs dataset evaluations, Virginia maintained its elite latency standing with a median round-trip time of 9.6 ms, while median download speeds jumped by +26.6 Mbps to reach 128.3 Mbps and upload speeds rose to 37.5 Mbps. While Virginia’s quality metrics rival the top 10, its overall ranking is moderated by prerequisite availability scores: wired access sits at 90.7% and low-priced plan coverage reaches 83%.

View 57 providers in Virginia →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

California

Ranked #15 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile

86.3

Overall / 100

Access
96.5%
Low-priced plan access
91.7%
Fiber availability
43.0%
Median download
129.9 Mbps
Median upload
23.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
10.5 ms

California (#15 – Score: 86.3 | Grade: B) slips two positions from #13 in 2025, shifting slightly down despite steady infrastructure growth. The Golden State remains anchored by exceptional prerequisite availability, providing 96.5% of residents with wired broadband coverage and 91.7% with access to low-priced plan tiers. However, California’s overall rank is capped by a 43% fiber-optic footprint, which (despite growing by +3.3 percentage points over the last 12 months) still trails the national state average of 56.6% by nearly 14 points. Even with this fiber deficit, California’s network responsiveness remains elite, delivering median download speeds of 129.9 Mbps and a responsive median latency of 10.5 ms.

View 129 providers in California →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Iowa

Ranked #16 of 51 ▲ 15 · 2026 State Profile

85.7

Overall / 100

Access
95.7%
Low-priced plan access
78.0%
Fiber availability
69.9%
Median download
131.9 Mbps
Median upload
43.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
21.4 ms

Iowa (#16 – Score: 85.7 | Grade: B) is the breakout success story of our 2026 evaluation, leaping +15 positions upward from #31 in 2025. This dramatic climb was propelled by aggressive physical infrastructure modernization, as fiber-optic service availability surged by +8.7 percentage points year-over-year to reach nearly 70% of state residents. This infrastructure buildout yielded massive performance dividends across statewide speed test benchmarks: Iowa’s median download speed jumped by +45.9 Mbps (reaching 131.9 Mbps), while median upload speeds climbed by +14 Mbps to 43.3 Mbps. Although low-priced plan availability held steady at 78%, Iowa’s rapid fiber deployment has transformed it into one of the fastest-rising digital economies in the Midwest.

View 164 providers in Iowa →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

District of Columbia

Ranked #17 of 51 ▼ 3 · 2026 State Profile

85.1

Overall / 100

Access
99.8%
Low-priced plan access
99.8%
Fiber availability
86.3%
Median download
101.8 Mbps
Median upload
23.8 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
14.1 ms

District of Columbia (#17 – Score: 85.1 | Grade: B) slips three positions from #14 in 2025, but continues to lead the nation in raw infrastructure density. As an urban district, Washington D.C. achieves the highest prerequisite metrics in America, boasting 99.8% wired or fixed wireless availability, 99.8% low-priced plan access, and an unmatched 86.3% fiber-optic service footprint. However, because our methodology assigns 30% of its total weight to M-Labs speed test quality, D.C.’s overall rank is held back by lower median performance numbers relative to state peers. While download speeds improved by +14.9 Mbps to reach 101.8 Mbps and upload speeds rose to 23.8 Mbps, median round-trip latency increased slightly from 10.6 ms to 14.1 ms.

View 22 providers in District of Columbia →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Missouri

Ranked #18 of 51 ▲ 12 · 2026 State Profile

84.5

Overall / 100

Access
93.9%
Low-priced plan access
76.4%
Fiber availability
61.9%
Median download
126.9 Mbps
Median upload
39.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
19.1 ms

Missouri (#18 – Score: 84.5 | Grade: B) registers a major upward leap in 2026, climbing +12 spots from #30 on the back of aggressive fiber rollouts and sharp latency improvements. The Show-Me State expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +7.6 percentage points over the past year to reach 61.9% of the population, while baseline wired availability grew by +2.9 percentage points to hit 93.9%. This infrastructure expansion resolved historical latency issues, driving median round-trip time down from 27.2 ms to a responsive 19.1 ms. Consumer speed evaluations reflected similar progress, as median download speeds increased by +23.5 Mbps to 126.9 Mbps and upload speeds surged by +10.4 Mbps to reach 39.9 Mbps.

View 110 providers in Missouri →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Rhode Island

Ranked #19 of 51 ▼ 11 · 2026 State Profile

84.4

Overall / 100

Access
96.9%
Low-priced plan access
96.3%
Fiber availability
85.0%
Median download
106.1 Mbps
Median upload
24.0 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
13.2 ms

Rhode Island (#19 – Score: 84.4 | Grade: B) experiences a sharp regression in our 2026 evaluation, tumbling -11 positions down from #8 in 2025. The Ocean State maintains an exceptional physical infrastructure baseline, ranking second nationally with an 85% fiber-optic service footprint alongside 96.9% wired availability and 96.3% low-priced plan access. However, Rhode Island’s drop in the standings was triggered by a noticeable compression in real-world consumer speed test metrics. Across M-Labs evaluations, median download speeds fell by -5.6 Mbps down to 106.1 Mbps, while median upload speeds dropped by -5.3 Mbps to land at 24 Mbps, penalizing its quality score despite a sharp median latency of 13.2 ms.

View 13 providers in Rhode Island →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Nevada

Ranked #20 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

84.1

Overall / 100

Access
98.9%
Low-priced plan access
90.8%
Fiber availability
38.4%
Median download
118.4 Mbps
Median upload
32.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
24.9 ms

Nevada (#20 – Score: 84.1 | Grade: B) advances two spots from #22 in 2025, breaking into the top 20 through expanding affordability and rapid fiber deployment. The Silver State excels in foundational access prerequisites, providing 98.9% of residents with basic wired or fixed wireless service and increasing low-priced plan availability by +1.6 percentage points to reach 90.8%. Over the past 12 months, Nevada aggressively expanded its fiber-optic footprint, adding +8.3 percentage points of coverage to reach 38.4% of the population. This buildout boosted consumer speeds, driving median downloads up by +24.9 Mbps to 118.4 Mbps and uploads up to 32.9 Mbps, though median latency increased slightly to 24.9 ms.

View 45 providers in Nevada →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Oklahoma

Ranked #21 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile

83.2

Overall / 100

Access
93.3%
Low-priced plan access
75.8%
Fiber availability
62.4%
Median download
122.1 Mbps
Median upload
33.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
17.4 ms

Oklahoma (#21 – Score: 83.2 | Grade: B) jumps +7 positions in 2026, rising from #28 by combining strong fiber deployment with improving baseline connectivity. Over the past year, Oklahoma expanded its wired or fixed wireless availability by +2.2 percentage points to reach 93.3% of residents, while fiber-optic service coverage surged by +8.2 percentage points to hit 62.4%. This infrastructure growth yielded noticeable performance gains across M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds increased by +23.2 Mbps to reach 122.1 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +9.6 Mbps to 33.9 Mbps, alongside a stable latency of 17.4 ms. Oklahoma’s overall rank remains moderated by its affordability prerequisite score, where low-priced plan access sits at 75.8%.

View 83 providers in Oklahoma →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Arkansas

Ranked #22 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile

83.0

Overall / 100

Access
88.8%
Low-priced plan access
78.1%
Fiber availability
62.4%
Median download
179.8 Mbps
Median upload
62.2 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
21.2 ms

Arkansas (#22 – Score: 83.0 | Grade: B) slips four positions from #18 in 2025, but emerges as one of the nation’s premier markets for raw upload speed performance. Fueled by a +6.6 percentage point increase in fiber-optic availability (now reaching 62.4% of residents), Arkansas recorded a median upload speed of 62.2 Mbps, a massive +26.5 Mbps YoY gain that ranks among the highest in America. Median download speeds experienced an equally dramatic +61.9 Mbps surge to reach 179.8 Mbps alongside a latency of 21.2 ms. Despite these exceptional quality metrics, Arkansas is held back in the overall standings by lower access prerequisites: basic wired availability sits at 88.8% and low-priced plan coverage reaches 78.1%.

View 73 providers in Arkansas →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B

Washington

Ranked #23 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

82.8

Overall / 100

Access
91.4%
Low-priced plan access
85.4%
Fiber availability
35.9%
Median download
111.4 Mbps
Median upload
30.2 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
8.0 ms

Washington (#23 – Score: 82.8 | Grade: B) moves up two spots from #25 in 2025, combining elite network responsiveness with incremental infrastructure growth. The Evergreen State remains a national benchmark for low latency, recording an M-Labs median round-trip time of just 8.0 ms (the second-lowest latency in the country). Over the past 12 months, Washington expanded baseline wired availability to 91.4% and increased low-priced plan coverage to 85.4%. While its 35.9% fiber-optic footprint trails national medians, ongoing upgrades pushed consumer performance upward, with median download speeds increasing by +18.8 Mbps to reach 111.4 Mbps and upload speeds rising to 30.2 Mbps.

View 78 providers in Washington →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B-

Utah

Ranked #24 of 51 ▼ 13 · 2026 State Profile

81.0

Overall / 100

Access
97.1%
Low-priced plan access
86.6%
Fiber availability
67.7%
Median download
117.4 Mbps
Median upload
31.6 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
29.0 ms

Utah (#24 – Score: 81.0 | Grade: B-) registers a notable decline in our 2026 rankings, tumbling -13 positions down from #11 in 2025. The Beehive State maintains a strong physical connectivity foundation, providing 97.1% of residents with wired or fixed wireless service and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +7 percentage points to reach 67.7%. However, Utah’s drop in the standings was driven by a compression in affordability and latency metrics. Low-priced plan availability fell by -1.6 percentage points down to 86.6%, while M-Labs speed test evaluations revealed a latency degradation from 22.3 ms up to 29.0 ms. Median download (117.4 Mbps) and upload speeds (31.6 Mbps) remained relatively flat year-over-year.

View 48 providers in Utah →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B-

Nebraska

Ranked #25 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

81.0

Overall / 100

Access
94.8%
Low-priced plan access
80.1%
Fiber availability
75.1%
Median download
138.7 Mbps
Median upload
49.1 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
49.9 ms

Nebraska (#25 – Score: 81.0 | Grade: B-) advances two positions from #27 in 2025, driven by robust fiber-optic infrastructure and surging download speeds. Over the past year, Nebraska expanded its fiber footprint by +6.3 percentage points to cover 75.1% of state residents, ranking among the top 10 fiber markets nationwide. This infrastructure buildout yielded impressive speed gains, as median download speeds jumped by +49.8 Mbps to reach 138.7 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +14.5 Mbps to 49.1 Mbps. However, Nebraska’s overall standing is constrained by network latency and affordability prerequisites: median round-trip time increased to 49.9 ms, while low-priced broadband plan availability covers 80.1% of the population.

View 65 providers in Nebraska →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
B-

North Dakota

Ranked #26 of 51 ▼ 7 · 2026 State Profile

80.7

Overall / 100

Access
99.2%
Low-priced plan access
68.5%
Fiber availability
72.0%
Median download
125.9 Mbps
Median upload
78.4 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
28.0 ms

North Dakota (#26 – Score: 80.7 | Grade: B-) slips seven spots from #19 in 2025, illustrating a stark contrast between top-tier speed capabilities and severe affordability barriers. The Peace Garden State boasts near-universal wired availability at 99.2% alongside a massive 72% fiber-optic service footprint. This infrastructure generates elite network performance, leading the nation with a median upload speed of 78.4 Mbps alongside download speeds reaching 125.9 Mbps and a latency of 28.0 ms. However, because our methodology heavily weighs affordability as a prerequisite to access, North Dakota is penalized by an affordability gap where only 68.5% of residents can secure low-priced broadband plans.

View 34 providers in North Dakota →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Michigan

Ranked #27 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

79.0

Overall / 100

Access
92.4%
Low-priced plan access
83.9%
Fiber availability
34.4%
Median download
153.0 Mbps
Median upload
23.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
19.0 ms

Michigan (#27 – Score: 79.0 | Grade: C+) moves up two spots from #29 in 2025, supported by steady infrastructure expansion and improving consumer download speeds. Over the past 12 months, the Great Lakes State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6 percentage points to reach 34.4% of the population, while baseline wired or fixed wireless availability grew to cover 92.4% of residents. Real-world network evaluations reflected solid progress, as median download speeds jumped by +36 Mbps to hit 153 Mbps and round-trip latency sharpened by -4.0 ms down to 19.0 ms. Michigan’s overall placement remains anchored by an 83.9% low-priced plan availability rate alongside median upload speeds of 23.9 Mbps.

View 92 providers in Michigan →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Maine

Ranked #28 of 51 ▲ 6 · 2026 State Profile

79.0

Overall / 100

Access
90.9%
Low-priced plan access
86.5%
Fiber availability
53.6%
Median download
166.7 Mbps
Median upload
28.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
28.9 ms

Maine (#28 – Score: 79.0 | Grade: C+) climbs +6 positions in 2026, rising from #34 through aggressive physical network modernization and expanding budget tiers. Over the past year, Maine delivered one of the nation’s most rapid fiber rollouts, increasing fiber-optic availability by +13.7 percentage points to reach 53.6% of state residents. This deployment directly improved baseline access and affordability prerequisites: basic wired coverage grew by +3.6 percentage points to hit 90.9%, while low-priced plan access expanded to 86.5%. In M-Labs speed test evaluations, median download speeds surged by +40.1 Mbps to reach 166.7 Mbps, upload speeds climbed to 28.7 Mbps, and latency sharpened to 28.9 ms.

View 28 providers in Maine →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Minnesota

Ranked #29 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile

78.8

Overall / 100

Access
94.7%
Low-priced plan access
79.9%
Fiber availability
54.2%
Median download
110.1 Mbps
Median upload
31.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
22.2 ms

Minnesota (#29 – Score: 78.8 | Grade: C+) registers an impressive +11 spot leap in 2026, rebounding from #40 on the strength of fiber network expansion and sharp latency improvements. Over the past 12 months, the North Star State increased its fiber-optic service footprint by +8.2 percentage points to cover 54.2% of the population, while maintaining a strong baseline wired availability of 94.7%. Crucially, Minnesota resolved previous routing bottlenecks in consumer evaluations, driving median latency down by -9.3 ms to reach a responsive 22.2 ms. While median download (110.1 Mbps) and upload speeds (31.7 Mbps) showed solid growth, overall placement is kept in the middle tier by a 79.9% low-priced plan access rate.

View 99 providers in Minnesota →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

South Dakota

Ranked #30 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

78.6

Overall / 100

Access
95.2%
Low-priced plan access
75.0%
Fiber availability
60.1%
Median download
173.6 Mbps
Median upload
30.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
28.4 ms

South Dakota (#30 – Score: 78.6 | Grade: C+) advances two spots from #32 in 2025, driven by a dramatic expansion in low-priced broadband plan availability and surging download speeds. Over the past year, South Dakota made major strides in closing its affordability gap, increasing budget-friendly plan access by +11.9 percentage points to reach 75% of residents alongside a 95.2% basic wired availability baseline. While its fiber-optic footprint contracted slightly by -2.4 percentage points to settle at 60.1%, consumer performance metrics soared: median download speeds jumped by +63.6 Mbps to reach 173.6 Mbps and round-trip latency sharpened by -3.6 ms down to 28.4 ms, though upload speeds hovered at 30.5 Mbps.

View 51 providers in South Dakota →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Vermont

Ranked #31 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile

78.5

Overall / 100

Access
88.3%
Low-priced plan access
77.1%
Fiber availability
60.5%
Median download
138.6 Mbps
Median upload
28.1 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
21.0 ms

Vermont (#31 – Score: 78.5 | Grade: C+) is one of New England’s biggest rising stars in 2026, surging +11 positions upward from #42 through aggressive infrastructure upgrades. The Green Mountain State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by a robust +11 percentage points year-over-year, bringing high-speed connectivity to 60.5% of the population. This physical deployment directly improved access prerequisites, as basic wired coverage climbed by +4.6 percentage points to 88.3% and low-priced plan availability rose to 77.1%. Consumer speed test evaluations reflected this modernization, with median download speeds jumping by +44.6 Mbps to reach 138.6 Mbps, upload speeds climbing to 28.1 Mbps, and latency staying sharp at 21.0 ms.

View 29 providers in Vermont →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Louisiana

Ranked #32 of 51 ▲ 13 · 2026 State Profile

78.5

Overall / 100

Access
87.3%
Low-priced plan access
81.4%
Fiber availability
50.0%
Median download
107.3 Mbps
Median upload
40.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
20.6 ms

Louisiana (#32 – Score: 78.5 | Grade: C+) registers a massive +13 spot jump in our 2026 rankings, rebounding from #45 through rapid fiber deployment and soaring upload speeds. Over the past 12 months, Louisiana expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +10.2 percentage points to reach 50% of residents, while improving baseline wired availability to 87.3% and low-priced plan access to 81.4%. This infrastructure investment transformed real-world network performance across M-Labs evaluations: median upload speeds more than doubled, surging by +21.2 Mbps to reach an elite 40.5 Mbps. Median download speeds also progressed to hit 107.3 Mbps, while round-trip latency improved by -3.5 ms down to 20.6 ms.

View 52 providers in Louisiana →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Tennessee

Ranked #33 of 51 ▼ 12 · 2026 State Profile

78.2

Overall / 100

Access
96.1%
Low-priced plan access
91.0%
Fiber availability
73.1%
Median download
129.2 Mbps
Median upload
24.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
34.2 ms

Tennessee (#33 – Score: 78.2 | Grade: C+) suffers a sharp regression in 2026, tumbling -12 positions down from #21 in 2025 despite robust physical infrastructure. The Volunteer State boasts exceptional availability prerequisites, providing 96.1% of residents with basic wired coverage, 91% with low-priced plan access, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +8.2 percentage points to reach 73.1%. However, Tennessee’s drop in the overall rankings was triggered by stagnation across real-world speed test quality metrics. In M-Labs evaluations, median upload speeds dipped by -2.4 Mbps down to 24.3 Mbps and median round-trip latency increased slightly to 34.2 ms, offsetting a modest download speed gain to 129.2 Mbps.

View 76 providers in Tennessee →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

North Carolina

Ranked #34 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile

78.1

Overall / 100

Access
92.1%
Low-priced plan access
85.4%
Fiber availability
56.4%
Median download
177.5 Mbps
Median upload
22.8 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
23.2 ms

North Carolina (#34 – Score: 78.1 | Grade: C+) moves up two positions from #36 in 2025, supported by expanding fiber-optic coverage and a dramatic surge in consumer download speeds. Over the past year, the Tar Heel State increased its fiber footprint by +8.1 percentage points to cover 56.4% of the population, while expanding baseline wired availability to 92.1% and low-priced plan access to 85.4%. This physical network growth drove significant performance gains across M-Labs dataset evaluations, as median download speeds jumped by +62 Mbps to reach 177.5 Mbps and latency improved to 23.2 ms. However, overall placement remains constrained by a median upload speed of 22.8 Mbps that falls below our 28 Mbps quality threshold.

View 59 providers in North Carolina →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Kentucky

Ranked #35 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile

78

Overall / 100

Access
89.9%
Low-priced plan access
81.9%
Fiber availability
65.9%
Median download
151.2 Mbps
Median upload
32.8 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
34.9 ms

Kentucky (#35 – Score: 78.0 | Grade: C+) slips two spots from #33 in 2025, shifting slightly down despite steady infrastructure modernization across the state. Over the past 12 months, Kentucky expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6.9 percentage points to reach 65.9% of residents, while maintaining solid access prerequisites: basic wired availability covers 89.9% of the population and low-priced broadband plans reach 81.9%. Real-world speed test evaluations reflected solid download progress, with median download speeds increasing by +39.8 Mbps to hit 151.2 Mbps alongside upload speeds of 32.8 Mbps. However, Kentucky’s overall ranking is held back by a median round-trip latency of 34.9 ms that trails regional peers.

View 77 providers in Kentucky →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C+

Alabama

Ranked #36 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile

77.5

Overall / 100

Access
88.0%
Low-priced plan access
79.6%
Fiber availability
57.1%
Median download
139.5 Mbps
Median upload
35.0 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
34.4 ms

Alabama (#36 – Score: 77.5 | Grade: C+) advances three positions from #39 in 2025, driven by rapid fiber network expansion and improving consumer speed metrics. Over the past year, the Yellowhammer State increased its fiber-optic availability by +8.4 percentage points to reach 57.1% of residents, while growing basic wired coverage to 88% and low-priced plan access to 79.6%. This buildout generated noticeable quality improvements across M-Labs speed evaluations: median download speeds surged by +28.7 Mbps to hit 139.5 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +10.7 Mbps to reach a robust 35 Mbps. Alabama’s upward trajectory was moderated slightly by an increase in median round-trip latency, which rose from 29 ms to 34.4 ms.

View 61 providers in Alabama →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

Mississippi

Ranked #37 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile

77.3

Overall / 100

Access
89.8%
Low-priced plan access
78.2%
Fiber availability
65.9%
Median download
114.3 Mbps
Median upload
40.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
28.6 ms

Mississippi (#37 – Score: 77.3 | Grade: C) slips two positions from #35 in 2025, yet stands out as one of the nation’s fastest-growing infrastructure markets. Over the past 12 months, the Magnolia State delivered massive prerequisite gains, expanding basic wired or fixed wireless availability by +7.4 percentage points to reach 89.8% of residents while growing low-priced plan access to 78.2%. Physical infrastructure also advanced rapidly, with fiber-optic coverage surging by +10.6 percentage points to hit 65.9%. This deployment drove elite upload performance across M-Labs evaluations, where median upload speeds reached 40.5 Mbps alongside downloads of 114.3 Mbps and a stable round-trip latency of 28.6 ms.

View 60 providers in Mississippi →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

Georgia

Ranked #38 of 51 ▼ 14 · 2026 State Profile

76.9

Overall / 100

Access
94.8%
Low-priced plan access
88.5%
Fiber availability
62.5%
Median download
110.9 Mbps
Median upload
23.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
23.2 ms

Georgia (#38 – Score: 76.9 | Grade: C) registers a sharp regression in our 2026 rankings, tumbling -14 positions down from #24 in 2025 despite strong baseline availability. The Peach State maintains solid prerequisite access metrics, providing 94.8% of residents with basic wired coverage, 88.5% with low-priced plan options, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +7.7 percentage points to reach 62.5%. However, Georgia’s drop in the standings was triggered by stagnation across real-world speed test evaluations relative to rapidly accelerating peers. In M-Labs dataset testing, median upload speeds remained flat at 23.7 Mbps (below our 28 Mbps passing threshold) and round-trip latency worsened from 20.5 ms up to 23.2 ms, offsetting a modest download gain to 110.9 Mbps.

View 68 providers in Georgia →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

West Virginia

Ranked #39 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile

74.7

Overall / 100

Access
79.3%
Low-priced plan access
68.8%
Fiber availability
36.2%
Median download
186.1 Mbps
Median upload
32.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
19.8 ms

West Virginia (#39 – Score: 74.7 | Grade: C) climbs +7 spots upward from #46 in 2025, making significant strides in overcoming historical topographic deployment challenges. Over the past year, the Mountain State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +7.3 percentage points to reach 36.2% of the population, while growing basic wired availability by +5 percentage points to hit 79.3%. This network modernization triggered massive performance improvements across M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds surged by +69 Mbps to reach an impressive 186.1 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 32.5 Mbps, and round-trip latency improved by -5.5 ms down to a responsive 19.8 ms. Further growth is capped primarily by an affordability gap where low-priced plans reach 68.8% of residents.

View 46 providers in West Virginia →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

South Carolina

Ranked #40 of 51 ▼ 20 · 2026 State Profile

73.9

Overall / 100

Access
95.6%
Low-priced plan access
87.1%
Fiber availability
58.3%
Median download
151.1 Mbps
Median upload
18.6 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
31.8 ms

South Carolina (#40 – Score: 73.9 | Grade: C) experienced the steepest regression in our 2026 evaluation, falling -20 positions down from #20 in 2025. While the Palmetto State actually expanded basic wired availability to 95.6% and increased fiber-optic penetration by +8.8 percentage points to hit 58.3%, its real-world quality metrics deteriorated sharply relative to regional peers. In our evaluation of M-Labs speed test datasets, South Carolina’s median round-trip latency worsened from 25.9 ms down to 31.8 ms, while median upload speeds fell by -3.2 Mbps (landing at 18.6 Mbps), severely penalizing its scaled performance score. Combined with an affordability tier where 87.1% of residents can access low-priced plans, this performance drop caused the state to fall behind rapidly accelerating telecom markets.

View 40 providers in South Carolina →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

Wisconsin

Ranked #41 of 51 — vs 2025 · 2026 State Profile

73.2

Overall / 100

Access
89.6%
Low-priced plan access
72.0%
Fiber availability
47.4%
Median download
132.8 Mbps
Median upload
20.2 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
18.4 ms

Wisconsin (#41 – Score: 73.2 | Grade: C) holds steady at #41 in our 2026 standings, making significant strides in basic availability while continuing to face affordability and speed challenges. Over the past year, the Badger State expanded its wired or fixed wireless broadband access by a robust +6.5 percentage points, bringing baseline coverage to 89.6% of residents alongside a 47.4% fiber-optic footprint (up +7.6% from 2025). However, overall ranking progress is restrained by an affordability prerequisite where low-priced broadband plans reach just 72% of the population. In M-Labs speed evaluations, median download speeds improved by +21 Mbps to hit 132.8 Mbps and latency sat at 18.4 ms, but median upload speeds lagged at 20.2 Mbps.

View 81 providers in Wisconsin →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C

Ohio

Ranked #42 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile

72.9

Overall / 100

Access
94.4%
Low-priced plan access
85.9%
Fiber availability
49.7%
Median download
142.5 Mbps
Median upload
15.6 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
30.5 ms

Ohio (#42 – Score: 72.9 | Grade: C) slips four positions from #38 in 2025, shifting down the standings despite robust baseline coverage and expanding fiber networks. The Buckeye State provides strong access prerequisites, covering 94.4% of residents with basic wired availability and 85.9% with budget-friendly low-priced plans. While physical infrastructure grew over the past year, with fiber-optic coverage adding +7.6 percentage points to reach 49.7% and download speeds rising to 142.5 Mbps, Ohio was heavily penalized by its upload speed quality mapping. In M-Labs dataset evaluations, Ohio generated a median upload speed of just 15.6 Mbps (a -2 Mbps YoY decline) alongside a round-trip latency of 30.5 ms.

View 97 providers in Ohio →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C-

Arizona

Ranked #43 of 51 ▼ 6 · 2026 State Profile

72.2

Overall / 100

Access
94.5%
Low-priced plan access
83.8%
Fiber availability
31.4%
Median download
117.3 Mbps
Median upload
19.5 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
24.3 ms

Arizona (#43 – Score: 72.2 | Grade: C-) drops six positions from #37 in 2025, experiencing a slowdown in real-world network performance relative to national benchmarks. The Grand Canyon State maintains a strong baseline availability prerequisite, covering 94.5% of residents with basic wired service and 83.8% with low-priced broadband plan options. Over the past 12 months, Arizona expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6.7 percentage points to reach 31.4% of the population. However, consumer speed test evaluations revealed performance bottlenecks: while median download speeds increased to 117.3 Mbps, median upload speeds dipped by -2.1 Mbps down to 19.5 Mbps alongside a round-trip latency of 24.3 ms.

View 67 providers in Arizona →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
C-

Oregon

Ranked #44 of 51 ▼ 18 · 2026 State Profile

71.9

Overall / 100

Access
92.8%
Low-priced plan access
81.5%
Fiber availability
51.8%
Median download
107.2 Mbps
Median upload
23.6 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
25.4 ms

Oregon (#44 – Score: 71.9 | Grade: C-) experiences one of the sharpest declines in our 2026 report, tumbling -18 positions down from #26 in 2025. While the Beaver State maintained solid basic wired coverage at 92.8% and expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +5.8 percentage points to hit 51.8%, its regression was driven by deteriorating affordability and latency metrics. Over the past year, low-priced plan availability dropped by -3.2 percentage points down to 81.5%, penalizing its heavily weighted prerequisite score. Simultaneously, M-Labs speed evaluations revealed a sharp degradation in network responsiveness, as median round-trip latency worsened from 18.2 ms up to 25.4 ms, offsetting modest download (107.2 Mbps) and upload speeds (23.6 Mbps).

View 72 providers in Oregon →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
D+

New Mexico

Ranked #45 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile

69.5

Overall / 100

Access
90.2%
Low-priced plan access
76.1%
Fiber availability
25.3%
Median download
104.4 Mbps
Median upload
23.8 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
20.7 ms

New Mexico (#45 – Score: 69.5 | Grade: D+) slips one spot from #44 in 2025, continuing to face geographic deployment barriers and a contracting affordability baseline. While basic wired or fixed wireless availability held steady at 90.2%, access to budget-friendly low-priced plans fell by -4 percentage points year-over-year down to 76.1%. Over the past 12 months, New Mexico expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +6.2 percentage points to reach 25.3% of residents, remaining among the lower fiber density markets in the country. Across M-Labs speed evaluations, consumer quality metrics showed modest progress, with median download speeds reaching 104.4 Mbps, upload speeds rising to 23.8 Mbps, and round-trip latency improving slightly to 20.7 ms.

View 56 providers in New Mexico →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
D+

Wyoming

Ranked #46 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile

68.3

Overall / 100

Access
88.2%
Low-priced plan access
70.2%
Fiber availability
42.9%
Median download
137.3 Mbps
Median upload
23.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
32.3 ms

Wyoming (#46 – Score: 68.3 | Grade: D+) climbs three positions from #49 in 2025, making significant progress in modernizing its physical network architecture across vast rural distances. Over the past year, the Equality State delivered an impressive fiber rollout, surging fiber-optic availability by +13.8 percentage points to reach 42.9% of residents alongside an 88.2% basic wired coverage baseline. This deployment helped narrow the state’s historical affordability gap, lifting low-priced plan availability by +4.5 percentage points up to 70.2%. In M-Labs speed test evaluations, consumer performance improved dramatically: median download speeds jumped by +45.1 Mbps to reach 137.3 Mbps and round-trip latency improved by -8.2 ms down to 32.3 ms, though upload speeds hovered at 23.7 Mbps.

View 34 providers in Wyoming →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
D

Hawaii

Ranked #47 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile

66.7

Overall / 100

Access
95.2%
Low-priced plan access
95.1%
Fiber availability
74.6%
Median download
86.5 Mbps
Median upload
16.3 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
98.8 ms

Hawaii (#47 – Score: 66.7 | Grade: D) drops four positions from #43 in 2025, illustrating a profound separation between high physical infrastructure density and geographic performance limits. As an island chain, Hawaii achieves outstanding access prerequisites, providing 95.2% of residents with basic wired availability, 95.1% with budget-friendly low-priced plans, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +11.4 percentage points to reach a massive 74.6%. However, because our methodology assigns 30% of its total weight to M-Labs speed test quality, Hawaii is severely penalized by physical distance to mainland server infrastructure. The state recorded the highest median latency in America at 98.8 ms, alongside lower median download (86.5 Mbps) and upload speeds (16.3 Mbps).

View 11 providers in Hawaii →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
D

Kansas

Ranked #48 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile

63.7

Overall / 100

Access
94.5%
Low-priced plan access
77.4%
Fiber availability
74.6%
Median download
58.4 Mbps
Median upload
17.9 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
25.5 ms

Kansas (#48 – Score: 63.7 | Grade: D) slips one spot from #47 in 2025, remaining a prime example of our methodology’s “Fiber Paradox”, where extensive fiber infrastructure does not automatically yield top-tier consumer speed tests. Over the past year, the Sunflower State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +11.1 percentage points to reach 74.6% of residents alongside 94.5% basic wired availability and 77.4% low-priced plan access. Despite this top-10 fiber penetration, Kansas ranked lowest nationwide in M-Labs download speed evaluations, recording a median download speed of just 58.4 Mbps alongside a median upload speed of 17.9 Mbps and a round-trip latency of 25.5 ms.

View 84 providers in Kansas →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
D

Idaho

Ranked #49 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile

63.2

Overall / 100

Access
91.8%
Low-priced plan access
73.0%
Fiber availability
41.8%
Median download
101.9 Mbps
Median upload
19.6 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
29.9 ms

Idaho (#49 – Score: 63.2 | Grade: D) slips one position from #48 in 2025, continuing to face challenges in rural infrastructure scaling and affordability tier distribution. Over the past 12 months, the Gem State made positive strides in physical deployment, expanding basic wired coverage by +4.3 percentage points to 91.8% and growing its fiber-optic footprint by +11.1 percentage points to reach 41.8% of the population. However, overall placement remains severely restricted by a low-priced plan availability rate of just 73%. In real-world speed evaluations, consumer download speeds progressed to 101.9 Mbps and latency improved to 29.9 ms, but median upload speeds remained stagnant at 19.6 Mbps.

View 61 providers in Idaho →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
F

Montana

Ranked #50 of 51 — vs 2025 · 2026 State Profile

51.4

Overall / 100

Access
83.0%
Low-priced plan access
53.0%
Fiber availability
33.8%
Median download
104.2 Mbps
Median upload
16.1 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
39.2 ms

Montana (#50 – Score: 51.4 | Grade: F) holds steady at #50 in our 2026 evaluation, remaining a significant mathematical outlier separated from the rest of the nation by severe affordability and deployment gaps. While basic wired or fixed wireless availability grew by +4.7 percentage points over the past year to reach 83%, nearly half of the state’s population remains priced out of budget tiers, with low-priced plan availability covering just 53% of residents. Fiber-optic infrastructure saw modest growth, adding +5.6 percentage points to reach 33.8% coverage. Across M-Labs evaluations, median download speeds progressed to 104.2 Mbps, but overall quality was heavily penalized by a median upload speed of 16.1 Mbps and a round-trip latency of 39.2 ms.

View 44 providers in Montana →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026
F

Alaska

Ranked #51 of 51 — vs 2025 · Largest affordability gap in US

27.6

Overall / 100

Access
76.7%
Low-priced plan access
0.1%
Fiber availability
14.7%
Median download
49.6 Mbps
Median upload
13.7 Mbps
Latency (RTT)
53.3 ms

Alaska (#51 – Score: 27.6 | Grade: F) ranks #51 as the lowest-performing region for broadband in 2026, generating an overall score that represents an extreme statistical outlier. Defined by vast geographic barriers and isolation from mainland networks, Alaska’s standing is anchored by a complete absence of affordable connectivity: while 76.7% of residents have basic wired or fixed wireless access, only 0.1% have access to low-priced broadband tiers. Because our scoring framework assigns a 30% weight to low-priced plan availability as an essential prerequisite, this cost barrier makes service practically out of reach for much of the population. Fiber-optic penetration remains scarce at 14.7%, and while M-Labs speed test evaluations showed median speeds of 49.6 Mbps download and 13.7 Mbps upload, geographic separation resulted in a high median latency of 53.3 ms.

View 26 providers in Alaska →Source: BroadbandNow Research · 2026

Policy Recommendations for State Broadband

1. Make affordability a condition, not an afterthought.

The states at the bottom of our rankings don’t primarily suffer from missing infrastructure; they suffer from unaffordable infrastructure. With ACP gone, BEAD’s low-cost service option requirement is the last major federal affordability lever. States should enforce it rigorously and publish plan pricing data so compliance is verifiable.

2. Judge networks by outcomes, not technology.

The 2025 restructuring of BEAD made the program technology-neutral. Our fiber paradox findings suggest that’s defensible, but only if performance standards are enforced. Whether a household is served by fiber, cable, fixed wireless, or satellite, the questions that matter are the ones we measure: real-world speed, latency, and price.

3. Treat uploads as first-class infrastructure.

8 states still post median uploads below the FCC’s 20 Mbps floor, and upload weakness was the common thread among this year’s biggest rank declines. Remote work, cloud storage, telehealth, and video communication have made upstream capacity a daily-life necessity. State broadband offices should weight upload performance accordingly in their grant scoring.

4. Watch consolidation in thin markets.

A shrinking provider count is not inherently bad, but in rural counties with one or two options, every exit matters. Merger review and subgrant awards should account for local, not national, market concentration.

Methodology

We score each state based on several weighted categories:

Category weights

Wired/fixed wireless access 35%
Wired low-priced access 30%
Median RTT latency 10%
Median download speed 10%
Median upload speed 10%
Fiber-optic access 5%

Access

To assess internet access, we look at three metrics: access to wired or fixed wireless broadband internet, access to low-priced broadband internet, and access to fiber-optic service.

The first two access metrics are the most highly weighted elements in our methodology (making up 65% of the total score) because they both serve as a prerequisite for anything else. If broadband internet is only available to a select few, or if it is so cost prohibitive that only a few can use it, then the quality would be of considerably less importance.

We also consider access to fiber-optic service because it is the fastest and most reliable internet technology available today.

Quality

To assess internet quality, we analyzed download speed, upload speed, and round trip time, which is a measure of latency. Depending on what you use the internet for, any one of those three metrics could be the most important thing to you.

People who play a lot of online competitive video games may consider latency to be the most important, a live streamer or business owner might prioritize upload speed, while an everyday user who mostly uses the internet for watching streaming services could be most interested in download speeds. You can use our bandwidth calculator to find out what’s right for you.

We analyzed over 160 million speed tests from the M-Labs NDT Data Set between January 1st and June 15th, 2026 for their upload speed, download speed, and round trip time.

Scoring

We gave every state a score from 0 to 100 for each of the six categories, and then weighted and added them together to get a final score from 0 to 100.

The three access categories are percentages that already range from 0 to 100, so we did not modify those for their score.

We calculated the three quality categories by linearly mapping each state’s median speed to a scale from 0 to 100. For each metric, we set the speed which corresponds to a score of 100 and 59 (RTT: 10 ms and 20 ms; download: 130 Mbps and 110 Mbps; upload: 35 Mbps and 28 Mbps), and we scaled the intermediate values proportionally.

Looking Ahead: The Build-Out Begins

This is the last edition of this report that will describe a pre-BEAD America. With nearly every state’s final proposal now federally approved, award agreements signed, and construction beginning across dozens of states in 2026, the next several editions of this study will measure whether $42+ billion in public investment actually moves the numbers that matter. Our findings suggest what to watch:

  1. Affordability, not availability, is the binding constraint in the lowest-ranked states. BEAD’s low-cost option requirements will matter as much as its construction milestones.
  2. The performance bar is rising fast, as networks built to yesterday’s standards will be obsolete on delivery.
  3. Rural states need tailored solutions, with the Alaska problem presenting a pricing problem, not an engineering problem.
  4. Consolidation bears watching, as meaningful choice, not provider counts, drives good consumer outcomes.

The 2026 rankings tell a story of genuine, measurable progress, and of a stubborn economic divide that speed alone cannot close. The states that pair fast networks with affordable plans dominate the top of our rankings. Until that combination reaches the bottom of the list, the digital divide will remain very much open.

About This Study

BroadbandNow Research produces comprehensive analyses of America’s broadband landscape to inform policymakers, journalists, and consumers. Our 2026 Best and Worst States study continues our commitment to data-driven insights that advance the goal of universal connectivity. Our 2026 Best and Worst Cities for Broadband study is also another pillar in our mission to point out these infrastructural differences across the nation.

For more information, data requests, or media inquiries, visit broadbandnow.com/research.

How to cite this report

BroadbandNow Research. “The Best and Worst States for Broadband 2026.” [PUBLICATION DATE] 2026.

Need more data or expert commentary?

Our research team can provide custom data cuts, state-level breakdowns, and expert commentary for your story. Reach us at press@broadbandnow.com.

Are you a journalist or researcher writing about this topic?

Contact us and we'll connect you with a broadband market expert on our team who can provide insights and data to support your work.