Executive Summary
Every year, our team analyzes broadband access, affordability, performance, and competition across all 50 states and Washington, D.C. to determine which states are leading and lagging in closing the digital divide. Each state is scored on six weighted factors: broadband availability, low-priced plan availability, fiber access, download speed, upload speed, and latency. For the 2026 edition, we analyzed over 160 million speed tests alongside our proprietary availability and pricing data covering every provider in the country.
Why It Matters
2026 is the year the ground starts breaking. With nearly all BEAD final proposals now federally approved and construction beginning across dozens of states, this report captures the clearest baseline yet of where American broadband stands before the largest infrastructure investment in the internet’s history reshapes the map. The headline is a paradox: network performance is improving faster than at any point since we began publishing this study, with average download speeds up 26% in a single year. Yet in the states at the bottom of our rankings, the barrier remains what it has always been: not whether a network exists, but whether anyone can afford to use it.
Key Findings
New Jersey is America’s best state for broadband for the second consecutive year.
The Garden State scored 97.4 out of 100, with perfect marks in all three network quality categories and low-priced plans available to 98.4% of households. Maryland, Connecticut, and Massachusetts round out the top four.
Alaska finishes dead last again.
Just 0.1% of Alaska households have access to a low-priced broadband plan, producing a 76.6-point affordability gap, by far the nation’s largest. Its 49.6 Mbps median download is also the slowest in the country. Montana, Idaho, and Kansas join it at the bottom of the rankings.
American internet speeds surged.
The national average of state median download speeds rose from 107.3 Mbps to 133.7 Mbps (+25%) year over year, and 48 of 51 states now post median downloads of 100 Mbps or better, up from just 31 last year.
The heartland is staging a comeback.
Iowa (up 15 spots), Louisiana (up 13), Missouri (up 12), and Indiana, Minnesota, and Vermont (each up 11) posted the year’s biggest gains, powered by fiber build-outs and major speed improvements.
South Carolina suffered the year’s steepest fall.
The state plunged 20 spots from #20 to #40, with Oregon (down 18 spots), Georgia (down 14), and Utah (down 13) close behind. Upload performance was the common culprit.
Fiber’s footprint expanded sharply.
Average state fiber coverage climbed from 49.7% to 56.6% of households, but fiber alone still doesn’t guarantee results. Kansas and Hawaii both have 74.6% fiber coverage and both sit in the bottom five.
The upload divide persists.
Eight states still post median upload speeds below 20 Mbps, the FCC’s minimum benchmark for broadband.
Provider consolidation is accelerating.
The average state lost roughly nine provider options year over year, from 70.8 to 62, led by Iowa (203 to 164) and Texas (197 to 159).
Interactive · Explore the 2026 rankings
The Best and Worst States for Broadband in 2026
Top 10 Best States for Broadband
| Rank | State | Score | Grade | 2025 Rank | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey | 97.4 | A | 1 | Perfect scores in all three network quality categories; 98.4% low-price plan access |
| 2 | Maryland | 96.4 | A | 2 | Perfect scores in every quality category, anchored by sub-10 ms latency |
| 3 | Connecticut | 96.3 | A | 4 | 185.9 Mbps median download and 79.7% fiber coverage, highest of any top-10 state |
| 4 | Massachusetts | 95.5 | A | 6 | Highest wired/fixed wireless availability of any state (99.0%) |
| 5 | Delaware | 95.1 | A | 3 | Balanced excellence: 96.2% low-price access and perfect quality scores |
| 6 | New Hampshire | 92.9 | A | 5 | Fastest downloads in America (210.6 Mbps median) |
| 7 | Florida | 92.6 | A | 9 | Best big state w/ 166.3 Mbps median speeds and 91.9% low-price access |
| 8 | Illinois | 92.2 | A- | 15 | Sub-9 ms latency and a top-10 finish with just 39.6% fiber coverage |
| 9 | New York | 91.9 | A- | 10 | Lowest median latency in the nation (7.0 ms) |
| 10 | Texas | 91.5 | A- | 7 | Scale leader: 159 providers and 67.6% fiber across a massive footprint |
Bottom 10 Worst States for Broadband
| Rank | State | Score | Grade | 2025 Rank | Key Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Alaska | 27.6 | F | 51 | 0.1% low-priced broadband access; a 76.6-point affordability gap |
| 50 | Montana | 51.4 | F | 50 | 30-point affordability gap; only 53% can get a low-priced plan |
| 49 | Idaho | 63.2 | D | 48 | Below-average marks in every single category |
| 48 | Kansas | 63.7 | D | 47 | Slowest median download in America (58.4 Mbps) despite 74.6% fiber coverage |
| 47 | Hawaii | 66.7 | D | 43 | 98.8 ms median round trip time, the worst latency in the nation |
| 46 | Wyoming | 68.3 | D+ | 49 | 18-point affordability gap and 32.3 ms median latency |
| 45 | New Mexico | 69.5 | D+ | 44 | Just 25.3% fiber coverage, second-lowest in the U.S. |
| 44 | Oregon | 71.9 | C- | 26 | Fell 18 spots on weak uploads (23.6 Mbps) and rising latency |
| 43 | Arizona | 72.2 | C- | 37 | 31.4% fiber coverage, third-lowest in the country |
| 42 | Ohio | 72.9 | C | 38 | Lowest median upload speed in the nation (15.6 Mbps) |
New for 2026: We’ve refined our letter grades to include plus/minus distinctions, giving a more precise picture of where each state stands.
The States With the Biggest Rank Changes Since 2025
Biggest Climbers
| State | 2025 Rank | 2026 Rank | Change | 2026 Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | 31 | 16 | ▲ 15 | B |
| Louisiana | 45 | 32 | ▲ 13 | C+ |
| Missouri | 30 | 18 | ▲ 12 | B |
| Minnesota | 40 | 29 | ▲ 11 | C+ |
| Vermont | 42 | 31 | ▲ 11 | C+ |
| Indiana | 23 | 12 | ▲ 11 | A- |
The Midwest broadband boom is real. Four of the six biggest climbers sit in America’s heartland, and the pattern behind their rise is consistent: aggressive fiber expansion meeting genuine speed gains. Iowa, long a case study in how provider quantity doesn’t equal quality, jumped 15 spots to #16 as its median download speed rose more than 50% year over year to 131.9 Mbps and fiber reached 69.9% of households. Missouri (up 12 spots to #18) and Indiana (up 11 to #12, cracking the A range) followed similar playbooks. Indiana’s leap into the top 15 stands out: at 62.3% fiber coverage and a 140.4 Mbps median download, it now outperforms several coastal states that have historically dominated our rankings.
Louisiana’s 13-spot climb to #32 is the most policy-relevant story in this year’s data. The first state in the nation to receive federal approval at multiple stages of the BEAD process, Louisiana has treated broadband as an economic development priority for years, and the early returns are now visible in the consumer experience, with median downloads up roughly 16% and uploads more than doubling since last year’s report.
Biggest Declines
| State | 2025 Rank | 2026 Rank | Change | 2026 Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | 20 | 40 | ▼ 20 | C |
| Oregon | 26 | 44 | ▼ 18 | C- |
| Georgia | 24 | 38 | ▼ 14 | C |
| Utah | 11 | 24 | ▼ 13 | B- |
| Tennessee | 21 | 33 | ▼ 12 | C+ |
| Rhode Island | 8 | 19 | ▼ 11 | B |
South Carolina’s 20-spot collapse is the largest single-year decline we’ve recorded in this study. The state’s availability numbers actually improved (95.6% of households can get broadband, and 87.1% can get a low-priced plan), but its network quality cratered relative to a rapidly improving country. At 18.6 Mbps, South Carolina’s median upload speed is now among the five worst in the nation, a critical weakness in an era of video calls, cloud backups, and remote work. Oregon (down 18) and Georgia (down 14) tell similar stories: in 2026, standing still means falling behind. The performance bar is rising so quickly that a state can improve in absolute terms and still tumble down the rankings.
“48 of 51 states now post median download speeds of 100 Mbps or better, up from just 31 last year.”
National Broadband Speeds Surged in 2026
The 2026 data captures the fastest single-year improvement in network performance we have measured:
- Download speeds: The average state median jumped from 107.3 Mbps to 133.7 Mbps (+25%). Fourteen states now post median downloads above 150 Mbps; only three (Alaska, Kansas, and Hawaii) remain below 100 Mbps.
- Upload speeds: The average state median rose from 25.9 Mbps to 31.8 Mbps (+23%). Nineteen states now earn perfect upload scores, up from the five that did so in last year’s report.
- Latency: The average state median round trip time improved slightly from 23.7 ms to 23.2 ms, with seven states achieving perfect latency scores at under 10 ms: New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, Virginia, and Maryland.
The acceleration has many parents: multi-gig cable upgrades (notably DOCSIS 4.0 rollouts), continued fiber overbuilding in competitive metros, and consumers voting with their wallets for faster tiers. But it is unevenly distributed. New Hampshire’s 210.6 Mbps median download is more than four times faster than Alaska’s 49.6 Mbps, a gap between two American states that resembles the gap between different countries.
The Fastest and Slowest States for Broadband
- Fastest median download: New Hampshire, 210.6 Mbps
- Slowest median download: Alaska, 49.6 Mbps
- Fastest median upload: North Dakota, 78.4 Mbps, thanks largely to its rural fiber cooperatives
- Lowest latency: New York, 7.0 ms
- Highest latency: Hawaii, 98.8 ms (geography is destiny for the islands’ undersea-cable-dependent connections)
- Hidden speed champion: West Virginia posts the nation’s third-fastest median download (186.1 Mbps) yet ranks just 39th overall. For those who can get connected in the Mountain State, service is excellent; too many still can’t.
The States With the Largest Internet Affordability Gaps
For the second consecutive year, the defining divide in American broadband is not availability. It’s price. The affordability gap (the share of households who have broadband infrastructure available but no access to a low-priced plan) remains above 18 points in five states:
| State | % of Households With Broadband Available | % of Households With a Low-Priced Plan Available | Affordability Gap (percentage points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 76.7% | 0.1% | 76.6 pts |
| North Dakota | 99.2% | 68.5% | 30.7 pts |
| Montana | 83.0% | 53.0% | 30.0 pts |
| South Dakota | 95.2% | 75.0% | 20.2 pts |
| Idaho | 91.8% | 73.0% | 18.8 pts |
Alaska remains the starkest case in the nation: more than three-quarters of Alaska households technically have broadband available to them, yet almost none (one in a thousand) can purchase a plan we classify as low-priced. With the Affordable Connectivity Program now two years gone and no federal replacement in sight, the low-cost service option requirements attached to BEAD-funded networks represent the primary policy lever left for these states.
The geography of the affordability crisis is consistent: every state with an affordability gap above 18 points lies in the rural West or Great Plains, where sparse populations, long loop lengths, and thin competition keep prices structurally high.
Regional Broadband Trends: Northeast, Midwest, and West
The Northeast still owns the podium. For the second straight year, the top six states form a contiguous corridor of dense population, high incomes, and overlapping cable-versus-fiber competition along the Eastern Seaboard: New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Delaware, and New Hampshire.
The heartland is closing the gap. The Midwest and parts of the South produced nearly all of this year’s biggest climbers. Illinois (#8) cracked the top 10, the only Midwestern state to do so and a seven-spot jump from last year, while Indiana, Iowa, and Missouri all now sit in the top 20. Federal and state grant programs, electric co-op fiber builds, and aggressive telco fiber expansion are visibly moving the needle.
The Mountain West and Pacific are sliding. Nine of the bottom ten states lie west of the Mississippi; Ohio is the lone exception. Oregon’s 18-spot fall and Utah’s 13-spot fall stand out: both are states with strong tech-economy reputations whose consumer broadband experience is now measurably behind the national curve.
Why More Fiber Doesn’t Always Mean Better Broadband Rankings
Fiber coverage expanded more this year than in any year we’ve tracked, from 49.7% to 56.6% of households in the average state, yet our data continues to show that fiber deployment alone doesn’t guarantee better outcomes:
- Kansas: 74.6% fiber coverage, ranks 48th — with the slowest median download in America
- Hawaii: 74.6% fiber coverage, ranks 47th
- Tennessee: 73.1% fiber coverage, ranks 33rd
- North Dakota: 72.0% fiber coverage, ranks 26th
Meanwhile, states with modest fiber footprints continue to excel through robust cable (DOCSIS) and fixed wireless networks:
- Illinois: 39.6% fiber coverage, ranks 8th
- Nevada: 38.4% fiber coverage, ranks 20th
- Washington: 35.9% fiber coverage, ranks 23rd
The lesson for the BEAD era, now formally technology-neutral following the 2025 program restructuring, is that what a network delivers matters more than what it’s made of. Deployment without adoption, and infrastructure without affordable pricing, don’t move the consumer experience.
Internet Provider Competition and Consolidation by State
The American ISP market is consolidating. The average state lost roughly nine provider options this year (70.8 → 62), with the steepest declines in historically fragmented markets: Iowa fell from 203 providers to 164, Texas from 197 to 159, and California from 148 to 129.
Our long-standing finding holds: There is no strong correlation between provider count and broadband quality. Iowa still has more providers than any state in the nation and ranks 16th; Connecticut ranks 3rd with just 16. Rhode Island earns a B with 13. What matters is not how many logos appear on a coverage map, but whether at least two capable networks genuinely compete for each household. If consolidation continues, and BEAD subgrant awards may accelerate it as larger players absorb smaller grantees, regulators should watch pricing power closely, particularly in the rural markets where the affordability gap is already most acute.
2026 vs. 2025 National Broadband Statistics
| Metric | 2026 National Avg | 2025 National Avg | Best (2026) | Worst (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wired/Fixed Wireless Broadband Access (% of households) | 93.4% | 91.4% | District of Columbia (99.8%) | Alaska (76.7%) |
| Low-Priced Broadband Access (% of households) |
82.5% | 81.4% | District of Columbia (99.8%) | Alaska (0.1%) |
| Fiber Coverage (% of households) | 56.6% | 49.7% | District of Columbia (86.3%) | Alaska (14.7%) |
| Median Download Speed | 133.7 Mbps | 107.3 Mbps | New Hampshire (210.6 Mbps) | Alaska (49.6 Mbps) |
| Median Upload Speed | 31.8 Mbps | 25.9 Mbps | North Dakota (78.4 Mbps) |
Alaska (13.7 Mbps) |
| Median Latency (RTT) | 23.2 ms | 23.7 ms | New York (7 ms) | Hawaii (98.8 ms) |
| Provider Count | 62 | 71 | Iowa (164) | Hawaii (11) |
The Complete 2026 Rankings
| Rank | State | Grade | Score | 2025 Rank | Change | Download (Mbps) | Upload (Mbps) | Latency, RTT (ms) | % of Households With Fiber Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey | A | 97.4 | 1 | No change | 164.8 | 37.8 | 7.6 | 66.6% |
| 2 | Maryland | A | 96.4 | 2 | No change | 163.7 | 40.3 | 9.8 | 65.2% |
| 3 | Connecticut | A | 96.3 | 4 | ▲ 1 | 185.9 | 35.9 | 13.7 | 79.7% |
| 4 | Massachusetts | A | 95.5 | 6 | ▲ 2 | 135.4 | 35.1 | 12.5 | 51.5% |
| 5 | Delaware | A | 95.1 | 3 | ▼ 2 | 138.5 | 36.0 | 12.3 | 55.9% |
| 6 | New Hampshire | A | 92.9 | 5 | ▼ 1 | 210.6 | 57.7 | 15.0 | 61.6% |
| 7 | Florida | A | 92.6 | 9 | ▲ 2 | 166.3 | 34.3 | 12.7 | 59.9% |
| 8 | Illinois | A- | 92.2 | 15 | ▲ 7 | 136.9 | 35.3 | 8.1 | 39.6% |
| 9 | New York | A- | 91.9 | 10 | ▲ 1 | 156.0 | 30.0 | 7.0 | 66.6% |
| 10 | Texas | A- | 91.5 | 7 | ▼ 3 | 147.6 | 39.3 | 12.0 | 67.6% |
| 11 | Colorado | A- | 91.2 | 16 | ▲ 5 | 141.6 | 36.3 | 7.9 | 51.4% |
| 12 | Indiana | A- | 91.1 | 23 | ▲ 11 | 140.4 | 38.5 | 13.2 | 62.3% |
| 13 | Pennsylvania | A- | 90.5 | 12 | ▼ 1 | 143.4 | 32.4 | 15.3 | 56.6% |
| 14 | Virginia | B+ | 89.6 | 17 | ▲ 3 | 128.3 | 37.5 | 9.6 | 65.6% |
| 15 | California | B | 86.3 | 13 | ▼ 2 | 129.9 | 23.3 | 10.5 | 43.0% |
| 16 | Iowa | B | 85.7 | 31 | ▲ 15 | 131.9 | 43.3 | 21.4 | 69.9% |
| 17 | District of Columbia | B | 85.1 | 14 | ▼ 3 | 101.8 | 23.8 | 14.1 | 86.3% |
| 18 | Missouri | B | 84.5 | 30 | ▲ 12 | 126.9 | 39.9 | 19.1 | 61.9% |
| 19 | Rhode Island | B | 84.4 | 8 | ▼ 11 | 106.1 | 24.0 | 13.2 | 85.0% |
| 20 | Nevada | B | 84.1 | 22 | ▲ 2 | 118.4 | 32.9 | 24.9 | 38.4% |
| 21 | Oklahoma | B | 83.2 | 28 | ▲ 7 | 122.1 | 33.9 | 17.4 | 62.4% |
| 22 | Arkansas | B | 83.0 | 18 | ▼ 4 | 179.8 | 62.2 | 21.2 | 62.4% |
| 23 | Washington | B | 82.8 | 25 | ▲ 2 | 111.4 | 30.2 | 8.0 | 35.9% |
| 24 | Utah | B- | 81.0 | 11 | ▼ 13 | 117.4 | 31.6 | 29.0 | 67.7% |
| 25 | Nebraska | B- | 81.0 | 27 | ▲ 2 | 138.7 | 49.1 | 49.9 | 75.1% |
| 26 | North Dakota | B- | 80.7 | 19 | ▼ 7 | 125.9 | 78.4 | 28.0 | 72.0% |
| 27 | Michigan | C+ | 79.0 | 29 | ▲ 2 | 153.0 | 23.9 | 19.0 | 34.4% |
| 28 | Maine | C+ | 79.0 | 34 | ▲ 6 | 166.7 | 28.7 | 28.9 | 53.6% |
| 29 | Minnesota | C+ | 78.8 | 40 | ▲ 11 | 110.1 | 31.7 | 22.2 | 54.2% |
| 30 | South Dakota | C+ | 78.6 | 32 | ▲ 2 | 173.6 | 30.5 | 28.4 | 60.1% |
| 31 | Vermont | C+ | 78.5 | 42 | ▲ 11 | 138.6 | 28.1 | 21.0 | 60.5% |
| 32 | Louisiana | C+ | 78.5 | 45 | ▲ 13 | 107.3 | 40.5 | 20.6 | 50.0% |
| 33 | Tennessee | C+ | 78.2 | 21 | ▼ 12 | 129.2 | 24.3 | 34.2 | 73.1% |
| 34 | North Carolina | C+ | 78.1 | 36 | ▲ 2 | 177.5 | 22.8 | 23.2 | 56.4% |
| 35 | Kentucky | C+ | 78.0 | 33 | ▼ 2 | 151.2 | 32.8 | 34.9 | 65.9% |
| 36 | Alabama | C+ | 77.5 | 39 | ▲ 3 | 139.5 | 35.0 | 34.4 | 57.1% |
| 37 | Mississippi | C | 77.3 | 35 | ▼ 2 | 114.3 | 40.5 | 28.6 | 65.9% |
| 38 | Georgia | C | 76.9 | 24 | ▼ 14 | 110.9 | 23.7 | 23.2 | 62.5% |
| 39 | West Virginia | C | 74.7 | 46 | ▲ 7 | 186.1 | 32.5 | 19.8 | 36.2% |
| 40 | South Carolina | C | 73.9 | 20 | ▼ 20 | 151.1 | 18.6 | 31.8 | 58.3% |
| 41 | Wisconsin | C | 73.2 | 41 | No change | 132.8 | 20.2 | 18.4 | 47.4% |
| 42 | Ohio | C | 72.9 | 38 | ▼ 4 | 142.5 | 15.6 | 30.5 | 49.7% |
| 43 | Arizona | C- | 72.2 | 37 | ▼ 6 | 117.3 | 19.5 | 24.3 | 31.4% |
| 44 | Oregon | C- | 71.9 | 26 | ▼ 18 | 107.2 | 23.6 | 25.4 | 51.8% |
| 45 | New Mexico | D+ | 69.5 | 44 | ▼ 1 | 104.4 | 23.8 | 20.7 | 25.3% |
| 46 | Wyoming | D+ | 68.3 | 49 | ▲ 3 | 137.3 | 23.7 | 32.3 | 42.9% |
| 47 | Hawaii | D | 66.7 | 43 | ▼ 4 | 86.5 | 16.3 | 98.8 | 74.6% |
| 48 | Kansas | D | 63.7 | 47 | ▼ 1 | 58.4 | 17.9 | 25.5 | 74.6% |
| 49 | Idaho | D | 63.2 | 48 | ▼ 1 | 101.9 | 19.6 | 29.9 | 41.8% |
| 50 | Montana | F | 51.4 | 50 | No change | 104.2 | 16.1 | 39.2 | 33.8% |
| 51 | Alaska | F | 47.6 | 51 | No change | 139.5 | 35.0 | 34.4 | 14.7% |
All 51 states and Washington, D.C., ranked 0–100 based on availability, affordability, performance, and competition.
State-by-State Breakdown
Every state’s full 2026 report card, in rank order, featuring availability, pricing, performance, and competition.
New Jersey
Ranked #1 of 51 — vs 2025 · Back-to-back national champion
97.4
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
98.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
98.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
66.6% |
| Median download |
|
164.8 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
37.8 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
7.6 ms |
New Jersey (#1 – Score: 97.4 | Grade: A) successfully defends its title as the nation’s top broadband market in 2026, holding steady at #1 with near-universal connectivity. The Garden State represents the gold standard of our weighted prerequisite criteria, providing 98.8% of residents with basic wired or fixed wireless access and 98.4% with low-priced plan options. While its fiber-optic footprint expanded by +2.1 percentage points to reach 66.6%, New Jersey’s dominance is cemented by its M-Labs network performance: median download speeds surged by +27.6 Mbps over the past year to reach 164.8 Mbps, while median latency clocked in at a nation-best 7.6 ms, earning perfect quality scores across the board.
Maryland
Ranked #2 of 51 — vs 2025 · Elite East Coast performer
96.4
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
98.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
95.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
65.2% |
| Median download |
|
163.7 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
40.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
9.8 ms |
Maryland (#2 – Score: 96.4 | Grade: A) maintains its elite #2 national ranking in 2026, driven by intense marketplace competition across 41 active providers. The state excels in fundamental availability, delivering 98.2% wired or fixed wireless coverage and 95.9% low-priced plan access (up +0.6% from 2025). Maryland’s network quality is equally commanding across consumer speed evaluations, where median download speeds jumped by +34.8 Mbps to reach 163.7 Mbps alongside a nation-leading median upload speed of 40.3 Mbps. Supported by a 65.2% fiber-optic service footprint and a highly responsive median latency of 9.8 ms, Maryland remains a premier digital environment for competitive gamers, remote businesses, and streamers.
Connecticut
Ranked #3 of 51 ▲ 1 · 2026 State Profile
96.3
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
98.5% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
97.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
79.7% |
| Median download |
|
185.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
35.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
13.7 ms |
Connecticut (#3 – Score: 96.3 | Grade: A) rises one position in 2026, overtaking Delaware to capture the #3 spot nationwide. This upward trajectory was powered by aggressive physical infrastructure buildouts, as fiber-optic service availability expanded by +4.9 percentage points to reach 79.7% of state residents (the highest fiber density in New England). This modern network architecture directly satisfied our prerequisite affordability and access criteria, with wired coverage reaching 98.5% and low-priced tier availability hitting 97.8%. Real-world performance followed suit, as median download speeds across M-Labs evaluations surged by +34.3 Mbps to reach an impressive 185.9 Mbps alongside a median round-trip latency of 13.7 ms.
Massachusetts
Ranked #4 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
95.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
99.0% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
97.6% |
| Fiber availability |
|
51.5% |
| Median download |
|
135.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
35.1 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
12.5 ms |
Massachusetts (#4 – Score: 95.5 | Grade: A) climbs two spots in our 2026 rankings, moving up from #6 on the strength of near-universal baseline connectivity and expanding fiber networks. The Commonwealth delivers exceptional access prerequisites, leading the nation with 99% wired or fixed wireless availability and 97.6% access to low-priced broadband plans. While its 51.5% fiber-optic penetration trails regional leaders like Connecticut and Rhode Island, year-over-year fiber growth of +3 percentage points yielded noticeable performance gains. Across state speed test evaluations, Massachusetts residents experienced median download speeds of 135.4 Mbps (a +14.5 Mbps YoY gain), median upload speeds of 35.1 Mbps, and a low median latency of 12.5 ms.
Delaware
Ranked #5 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile
95.1
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
98.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
96.2% |
| Fiber availability |
|
55.9% |
| Median download |
|
138.5 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
36.0 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
12.3 ms |
Delaware (#5 – Score: 95.1 | Grade: A) slips two positions from #3 in 2025, yet remains comfortably entrenched in the top five nationwide with an outstanding Grade-A score. The First State continues to deliver robust access prerequisites, providing 98.2% of residents with basic wired coverage and 96.2% with budget-friendly plan options. Although Delaware’s median download speed dipped slightly by -3.1 Mbps to land at 138.5 Mbps, its overall quality metrics remain highly competitive. Supported by a 55.9% fiber-optic footprint (up +2.8% from 2025) and median upload speeds climbing to 36 Mbps, Delaware provides a stable, responsive network environment with a median latency of just 12.3 ms.
New Hampshire
Ranked #6 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile
92.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
94.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
61.6% |
| Median download |
|
210.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
57.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
15.0 ms |
New Hampshire (#6 – Score: 92.9 | Grade: A) shifts one spot down from #5 in 2025, but stands out as one of the fastest absolute speed markets in the United States. Fueled by a +7.4 percentage point surge in fiber availability (now reaching 61.6% of residents), New Hampshire generated a blistering median download speed of 210.6 Mbps, representing a massive +45.3 Mbps YoY jump and the highest state download median in our report. Median upload speeds saw an equally impressive +18.4 Mbps increase to reach 57.7 Mbps, while latency improved to 15.0 ms. The state’s overall standing is kept just outside the top five by its affordability prerequisite score, where low-priced plan access sits at 94.1%.
Florida
Ranked #7 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
92.6
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
91.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
59.9% |
| Median download |
|
166.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
34.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
12.7 ms |
Florida (#7 – Score: 92.6 | Grade: A) advances two positions in 2026, rising from #9 to capture Grade-A status across a massive geographic footprint. The Sunshine State’s growth was driven by rapid physical infrastructure deployment, with fiber-optic availability surging by +9.3 percentage points over the past year to cover 59.9% of the population. This network expansion yielded significant performance gains across M-Labs dataset tests, where median download speeds climbed by +32.9 Mbps to reach 166.3 Mbps and median latency improved by -1.4 ms down to a responsive 12.7 ms. Combined with solid prerequisite metrics, including 95.9% wired availability and 91.9% low-priced plan access, Florida proves that large, diverse states can achieve elite connectivity benchmarks.
Illinois
Ranked #8 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile
92.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.1% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
88.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
39.6% |
| Median download |
|
136.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
35.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
8.1 ms |
Illinois (#8 – Score: 92.2 | Grade: A-) is one of the nation’s most impressive top-tier movers in 2026, leaping +7 spots upward from #15 to break into the top 10. This surge was catalyzed by significant network improvements that elevated its overall score by more than 12 points. While Illinois’s 39.6% fiber footprint remains relatively low compared to coastal leaders, a +6.3 percentage point expansion over 2025 levels drove major quality gains. Across state speed evaluations, median download speeds jumped by +31 Mbps to reach 136.9 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 35.3 Mbps, and round-trip latency sharpened to an elite 8.1 ms (the third-lowest latency in the country). Baseline availability also remains strong, with 96.1% wired coverage and 88.5% low-priced plan access.
New York
Ranked #9 of 51 ▲ 1 · 2026 State Profile
91.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.1% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
92.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
66.6% |
| Median download |
|
156.0 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
30.0 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
7.0 ms |
New York (#9 – Score: 91.9 | Grade: A-) moves up one position from #10 in 2025, combining high population density with exceptional network responsiveness. The Empire State excels in latency performance, generating a median round-trip time of just 7 ms, the lowest recorded latency of any state evaluated in our report. New York also strengthened its prerequisite foundation over the past 12 months, expanding basic wired coverage to 96.1% and increasing low-priced broadband availability by +0.7 percentage points to reach 92.9%. Supported by a 66.6% fiber-optic footprint, real-world consumer speed tests showed significant progress, with median download speeds jumping +36.5 Mbps to reach 156 Mbps and upload speeds rising to 30 Mbps.
Texas
Ranked #10 of 51 ▼ 3 · 2026 State Profile
91.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
84.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
67.6% |
| Median download |
|
147.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
39.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
12.0 ms |
Texas (#10 – Score: 91.5 | Grade: A-) slips three positions from #7 in 2025, but maintains its position inside the top 10 through massive market competition and aggressive infrastructure buildouts. With nearly 200 active broadband providers operating statewide, Texas expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by a robust +8.8 percentage points year-over-year to reach 67.6% of residents. This ongoing modernization translated directly into higher consumer speeds, as median downloads increased by +24.2 Mbps to 147.6 Mbps and upload speeds climbed to 39.3 Mbps alongside a responsive median latency of 12.0 ms. While Texas scores highly in wired availability (95.9%), its overall ranking is constrained slightly by an 84.5% low-priced plan availability rate that trails Northeastern leaders.
Colorado
Ranked #11 of 51 ▲ 5 · 2026 State Profile
91.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
84.6% |
| Fiber availability |
|
51.4% |
| Median download |
|
141.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
36.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
7.9 ms |
Colorado (#11 – Score: 91.2 | Grade: A-) climbs +5 positions in 2026, rising from #16 on the strength of rapid fiber deployment and outstanding latency performance. The Centennial State expanded its fiber-optic availability by +8.3 percentage points over the past year, bringing high-speed infrastructure to 51.4% of the population. This physical buildout yielded immediate quality improvements in M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds increased by +33.9 Mbps to reach 141.6 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 36.3 Mbps, and median latency sharpened to 7.9 ms, ranking among the top five lowest latency states nationwide. Colorado is anchored by 94.9% wired coverage, though an 84.6% low-priced plan access rate leaves room for affordability growth.
Indiana
Ranked #12 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile
91.1
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.3% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
86.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
62.3% |
| Median download |
|
140.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
38.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
13.2 ms |
Indiana (#12 – Score: 91.1 | Grade: A-) registers one of the nation’s most dramatic upward surges in 2026, vaulting +11 spots from #23 and adding nearly 17 points to its overall score. This transformation was driven by across-the-board network modernization: fiber-optic service availability expanded by +7 percentage points to cover 62.3% of residents, while low-priced plan access rose to 86.5%. Real-world performance benchmarks improved drastically over 2025 levels, as median download speeds surged by +34.6 Mbps (reaching 140.4 Mbps) and median upload speeds jumped by +14.8 Mbps to hit 38.5 Mbps. Crucially, Indiana solved previous latency bottlenecks, improving its median round-trip time from 21.9 ms down to a responsive 13.2 ms.
Pennsylvania
Ranked #13 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile
90.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.7% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
93.2% |
| Fiber availability |
|
56.6% |
| Median download |
|
143.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
32.4 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
15.3 ms |
Pennsylvania (#13 – Score: 90.5 | Grade: A-) slips one spot from #12 in 2025, yet remains a strong, high-performing connectivity leader across the Mid-Atlantic. The Keystone State is anchored by solid prerequisite availability, providing 95.7% of residents with basic wired coverage and 93.2% with access to affordable, low-priced plans. Over the past 12 months, Pennsylvania expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +6 percentage points to reach 56.6% of the population. This ongoing fiber rollout drove solid performance gains across consumer speed evaluations, as median download speeds increased by +25.7 Mbps to 143.4 Mbps, upload speeds climbed to 32.4 Mbps, and median round-trip latency sharpened by -2.8 ms down to 15.3 ms.
Virginia
Ranked #14 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile
89.6
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
90.7% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
83.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
65.6% |
| Median download |
|
128.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
37.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
9.6 ms |
Virginia (#14 – Score: 89.6 | Grade: B+) advances +3 positions in 2026, rising from #17 by combining expanding fiber coverage with exceptional network responsiveness. The Commonwealth increased its fiber-optic service footprint by +6 percentage points year-over-year, bringing high-speed infrastructure to 65.6% of state residents. Across M-Labs dataset evaluations, Virginia maintained its elite latency standing with a median round-trip time of 9.6 ms, while median download speeds jumped by +26.6 Mbps to reach 128.3 Mbps and upload speeds rose to 37.5 Mbps. While Virginia’s quality metrics rival the top 10, its overall ranking is moderated by prerequisite availability scores: wired access sits at 90.7% and low-priced plan coverage reaches 83%.
California
Ranked #15 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile
86.3
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.5% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
91.7% |
| Fiber availability |
|
43.0% |
| Median download |
|
129.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
10.5 ms |
California (#15 – Score: 86.3 | Grade: B) slips two positions from #13 in 2025, shifting slightly down despite steady infrastructure growth. The Golden State remains anchored by exceptional prerequisite availability, providing 96.5% of residents with wired broadband coverage and 91.7% with access to low-priced plan tiers. However, California’s overall rank is capped by a 43% fiber-optic footprint, which (despite growing by +3.3 percentage points over the last 12 months) still trails the national state average of 56.6% by nearly 14 points. Even with this fiber deficit, California’s network responsiveness remains elite, delivering median download speeds of 129.9 Mbps and a responsive median latency of 10.5 ms.
Iowa
Ranked #16 of 51 ▲ 15 · 2026 State Profile
85.7
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.7% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
78.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
69.9% |
| Median download |
|
131.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
43.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
21.4 ms |
Iowa (#16 – Score: 85.7 | Grade: B) is the breakout success story of our 2026 evaluation, leaping +15 positions upward from #31 in 2025. This dramatic climb was propelled by aggressive physical infrastructure modernization, as fiber-optic service availability surged by +8.7 percentage points year-over-year to reach nearly 70% of state residents. This infrastructure buildout yielded massive performance dividends across statewide speed test benchmarks: Iowa’s median download speed jumped by +45.9 Mbps (reaching 131.9 Mbps), while median upload speeds climbed by +14 Mbps to 43.3 Mbps. Although low-priced plan availability held steady at 78%, Iowa’s rapid fiber deployment has transformed it into one of the fastest-rising digital economies in the Midwest.
District of Columbia
Ranked #17 of 51 ▼ 3 · 2026 State Profile
85.1
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
99.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
99.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
86.3% |
| Median download |
|
101.8 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.8 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
14.1 ms |
District of Columbia (#17 – Score: 85.1 | Grade: B) slips three positions from #14 in 2025, but continues to lead the nation in raw infrastructure density. As an urban district, Washington D.C. achieves the highest prerequisite metrics in America, boasting 99.8% wired or fixed wireless availability, 99.8% low-priced plan access, and an unmatched 86.3% fiber-optic service footprint. However, because our methodology assigns 30% of its total weight to M-Labs speed test quality, D.C.’s overall rank is held back by lower median performance numbers relative to state peers. While download speeds improved by +14.9 Mbps to reach 101.8 Mbps and upload speeds rose to 23.8 Mbps, median round-trip latency increased slightly from 10.6 ms to 14.1 ms.
Missouri
Ranked #18 of 51 ▲ 12 · 2026 State Profile
84.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
93.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
76.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
61.9% |
| Median download |
|
126.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
39.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
19.1 ms |
Missouri (#18 – Score: 84.5 | Grade: B) registers a major upward leap in 2026, climbing +12 spots from #30 on the back of aggressive fiber rollouts and sharp latency improvements. The Show-Me State expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +7.6 percentage points over the past year to reach 61.9% of the population, while baseline wired availability grew by +2.9 percentage points to hit 93.9%. This infrastructure expansion resolved historical latency issues, driving median round-trip time down from 27.2 ms to a responsive 19.1 ms. Consumer speed evaluations reflected similar progress, as median download speeds increased by +23.5 Mbps to 126.9 Mbps and upload speeds surged by +10.4 Mbps to reach 39.9 Mbps.
Rhode Island
Ranked #19 of 51 ▼ 11 · 2026 State Profile
84.4
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
96.3% |
| Fiber availability |
|
85.0% |
| Median download |
|
106.1 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
24.0 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
13.2 ms |
Rhode Island (#19 – Score: 84.4 | Grade: B) experiences a sharp regression in our 2026 evaluation, tumbling -11 positions down from #8 in 2025. The Ocean State maintains an exceptional physical infrastructure baseline, ranking second nationally with an 85% fiber-optic service footprint alongside 96.9% wired availability and 96.3% low-priced plan access. However, Rhode Island’s drop in the standings was triggered by a noticeable compression in real-world consumer speed test metrics. Across M-Labs evaluations, median download speeds fell by -5.6 Mbps down to 106.1 Mbps, while median upload speeds dropped by -5.3 Mbps to land at 24 Mbps, penalizing its quality score despite a sharp median latency of 13.2 ms.
Nevada
Ranked #20 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
84.1
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
98.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
90.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
38.4% |
| Median download |
|
118.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
32.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
24.9 ms |
Nevada (#20 – Score: 84.1 | Grade: B) advances two spots from #22 in 2025, breaking into the top 20 through expanding affordability and rapid fiber deployment. The Silver State excels in foundational access prerequisites, providing 98.9% of residents with basic wired or fixed wireless service and increasing low-priced plan availability by +1.6 percentage points to reach 90.8%. Over the past 12 months, Nevada aggressively expanded its fiber-optic footprint, adding +8.3 percentage points of coverage to reach 38.4% of the population. This buildout boosted consumer speeds, driving median downloads up by +24.9 Mbps to 118.4 Mbps and uploads up to 32.9 Mbps, though median latency increased slightly to 24.9 ms.
Oklahoma
Ranked #21 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile
83.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
93.3% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
75.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
62.4% |
| Median download |
|
122.1 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
33.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
17.4 ms |
Oklahoma (#21 – Score: 83.2 | Grade: B) jumps +7 positions in 2026, rising from #28 by combining strong fiber deployment with improving baseline connectivity. Over the past year, Oklahoma expanded its wired or fixed wireless availability by +2.2 percentage points to reach 93.3% of residents, while fiber-optic service coverage surged by +8.2 percentage points to hit 62.4%. This infrastructure growth yielded noticeable performance gains across M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds increased by +23.2 Mbps to reach 122.1 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +9.6 Mbps to 33.9 Mbps, alongside a stable latency of 17.4 ms. Oklahoma’s overall rank remains moderated by its affordability prerequisite score, where low-priced plan access sits at 75.8%.
Arkansas
Ranked #22 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile
83.0
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
88.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
78.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
62.4% |
| Median download |
|
179.8 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
62.2 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
21.2 ms |
Arkansas (#22 – Score: 83.0 | Grade: B) slips four positions from #18 in 2025, but emerges as one of the nation’s premier markets for raw upload speed performance. Fueled by a +6.6 percentage point increase in fiber-optic availability (now reaching 62.4% of residents), Arkansas recorded a median upload speed of 62.2 Mbps, a massive +26.5 Mbps YoY gain that ranks among the highest in America. Median download speeds experienced an equally dramatic +61.9 Mbps surge to reach 179.8 Mbps alongside a latency of 21.2 ms. Despite these exceptional quality metrics, Arkansas is held back in the overall standings by lower access prerequisites: basic wired availability sits at 88.8% and low-priced plan coverage reaches 78.1%.
Washington
Ranked #23 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
82.8
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
91.4% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
85.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
35.9% |
| Median download |
|
111.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
30.2 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
8.0 ms |
Washington (#23 – Score: 82.8 | Grade: B) moves up two spots from #25 in 2025, combining elite network responsiveness with incremental infrastructure growth. The Evergreen State remains a national benchmark for low latency, recording an M-Labs median round-trip time of just 8.0 ms (the second-lowest latency in the country). Over the past 12 months, Washington expanded baseline wired availability to 91.4% and increased low-priced plan coverage to 85.4%. While its 35.9% fiber-optic footprint trails national medians, ongoing upgrades pushed consumer performance upward, with median download speeds increasing by +18.8 Mbps to reach 111.4 Mbps and upload speeds rising to 30.2 Mbps.
Utah
Ranked #24 of 51 ▼ 13 · 2026 State Profile
81.0
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
97.1% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
86.6% |
| Fiber availability |
|
67.7% |
| Median download |
|
117.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
31.6 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
29.0 ms |
Utah (#24 – Score: 81.0 | Grade: B-) registers a notable decline in our 2026 rankings, tumbling -13 positions down from #11 in 2025. The Beehive State maintains a strong physical connectivity foundation, providing 97.1% of residents with wired or fixed wireless service and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +7 percentage points to reach 67.7%. However, Utah’s drop in the standings was driven by a compression in affordability and latency metrics. Low-priced plan availability fell by -1.6 percentage points down to 86.6%, while M-Labs speed test evaluations revealed a latency degradation from 22.3 ms up to 29.0 ms. Median download (117.4 Mbps) and upload speeds (31.6 Mbps) remained relatively flat year-over-year.
Nebraska
Ranked #25 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
81.0
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
80.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
75.1% |
| Median download |
|
138.7 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
49.1 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
49.9 ms |
Nebraska (#25 – Score: 81.0 | Grade: B-) advances two positions from #27 in 2025, driven by robust fiber-optic infrastructure and surging download speeds. Over the past year, Nebraska expanded its fiber footprint by +6.3 percentage points to cover 75.1% of state residents, ranking among the top 10 fiber markets nationwide. This infrastructure buildout yielded impressive speed gains, as median download speeds jumped by +49.8 Mbps to reach 138.7 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +14.5 Mbps to 49.1 Mbps. However, Nebraska’s overall standing is constrained by network latency and affordability prerequisites: median round-trip time increased to 49.9 ms, while low-priced broadband plan availability covers 80.1% of the population.
North Dakota
Ranked #26 of 51 ▼ 7 · 2026 State Profile
80.7
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
99.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
68.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
72.0% |
| Median download |
|
125.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
78.4 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
28.0 ms |
North Dakota (#26 – Score: 80.7 | Grade: B-) slips seven spots from #19 in 2025, illustrating a stark contrast between top-tier speed capabilities and severe affordability barriers. The Peace Garden State boasts near-universal wired availability at 99.2% alongside a massive 72% fiber-optic service footprint. This infrastructure generates elite network performance, leading the nation with a median upload speed of 78.4 Mbps alongside download speeds reaching 125.9 Mbps and a latency of 28.0 ms. However, because our methodology heavily weighs affordability as a prerequisite to access, North Dakota is penalized by an affordability gap where only 68.5% of residents can secure low-priced broadband plans.
Michigan
Ranked #27 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
79.0
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
92.4% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
83.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
34.4% |
| Median download |
|
153.0 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
19.0 ms |
Michigan (#27 – Score: 79.0 | Grade: C+) moves up two spots from #29 in 2025, supported by steady infrastructure expansion and improving consumer download speeds. Over the past 12 months, the Great Lakes State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6 percentage points to reach 34.4% of the population, while baseline wired or fixed wireless availability grew to cover 92.4% of residents. Real-world network evaluations reflected solid progress, as median download speeds jumped by +36 Mbps to hit 153 Mbps and round-trip latency sharpened by -4.0 ms down to 19.0 ms. Michigan’s overall placement remains anchored by an 83.9% low-priced plan availability rate alongside median upload speeds of 23.9 Mbps.
Maine
Ranked #28 of 51 ▲ 6 · 2026 State Profile
79.0
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
90.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
86.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
53.6% |
| Median download |
|
166.7 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
28.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
28.9 ms |
Maine (#28 – Score: 79.0 | Grade: C+) climbs +6 positions in 2026, rising from #34 through aggressive physical network modernization and expanding budget tiers. Over the past year, Maine delivered one of the nation’s most rapid fiber rollouts, increasing fiber-optic availability by +13.7 percentage points to reach 53.6% of state residents. This deployment directly improved baseline access and affordability prerequisites: basic wired coverage grew by +3.6 percentage points to hit 90.9%, while low-priced plan access expanded to 86.5%. In M-Labs speed test evaluations, median download speeds surged by +40.1 Mbps to reach 166.7 Mbps, upload speeds climbed to 28.7 Mbps, and latency sharpened to 28.9 ms.
Minnesota
Ranked #29 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile
78.8
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.7% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
79.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
54.2% |
| Median download |
|
110.1 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
31.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
22.2 ms |
Minnesota (#29 – Score: 78.8 | Grade: C+) registers an impressive +11 spot leap in 2026, rebounding from #40 on the strength of fiber network expansion and sharp latency improvements. Over the past 12 months, the North Star State increased its fiber-optic service footprint by +8.2 percentage points to cover 54.2% of the population, while maintaining a strong baseline wired availability of 94.7%. Crucially, Minnesota resolved previous routing bottlenecks in consumer evaluations, driving median latency down by -9.3 ms to reach a responsive 22.2 ms. While median download (110.1 Mbps) and upload speeds (31.7 Mbps) showed solid growth, overall placement is kept in the middle tier by a 79.9% low-priced plan access rate.
South Dakota
Ranked #30 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
78.6
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
75.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
60.1% |
| Median download |
|
173.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
30.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
28.4 ms |
South Dakota (#30 – Score: 78.6 | Grade: C+) advances two spots from #32 in 2025, driven by a dramatic expansion in low-priced broadband plan availability and surging download speeds. Over the past year, South Dakota made major strides in closing its affordability gap, increasing budget-friendly plan access by +11.9 percentage points to reach 75% of residents alongside a 95.2% basic wired availability baseline. While its fiber-optic footprint contracted slightly by -2.4 percentage points to settle at 60.1%, consumer performance metrics soared: median download speeds jumped by +63.6 Mbps to reach 173.6 Mbps and round-trip latency sharpened by -3.6 ms down to 28.4 ms, though upload speeds hovered at 30.5 Mbps.
Vermont
Ranked #31 of 51 ▲ 11 · 2026 State Profile
78.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
88.3% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
77.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
60.5% |
| Median download |
|
138.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
28.1 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
21.0 ms |
Vermont (#31 – Score: 78.5 | Grade: C+) is one of New England’s biggest rising stars in 2026, surging +11 positions upward from #42 through aggressive infrastructure upgrades. The Green Mountain State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by a robust +11 percentage points year-over-year, bringing high-speed connectivity to 60.5% of the population. This physical deployment directly improved access prerequisites, as basic wired coverage climbed by +4.6 percentage points to 88.3% and low-priced plan availability rose to 77.1%. Consumer speed test evaluations reflected this modernization, with median download speeds jumping by +44.6 Mbps to reach 138.6 Mbps, upload speeds climbing to 28.1 Mbps, and latency staying sharp at 21.0 ms.
Louisiana
Ranked #32 of 51 ▲ 13 · 2026 State Profile
78.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
87.3% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
81.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
50.0% |
| Median download |
|
107.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
40.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
20.6 ms |
Louisiana (#32 – Score: 78.5 | Grade: C+) registers a massive +13 spot jump in our 2026 rankings, rebounding from #45 through rapid fiber deployment and soaring upload speeds. Over the past 12 months, Louisiana expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +10.2 percentage points to reach 50% of residents, while improving baseline wired availability to 87.3% and low-priced plan access to 81.4%. This infrastructure investment transformed real-world network performance across M-Labs evaluations: median upload speeds more than doubled, surging by +21.2 Mbps to reach an elite 40.5 Mbps. Median download speeds also progressed to hit 107.3 Mbps, while round-trip latency improved by -3.5 ms down to 20.6 ms.
Tennessee
Ranked #33 of 51 ▼ 12 · 2026 State Profile
78.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
96.1% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
91.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
73.1% |
| Median download |
|
129.2 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
24.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
34.2 ms |
Tennessee (#33 – Score: 78.2 | Grade: C+) suffers a sharp regression in 2026, tumbling -12 positions down from #21 in 2025 despite robust physical infrastructure. The Volunteer State boasts exceptional availability prerequisites, providing 96.1% of residents with basic wired coverage, 91% with low-priced plan access, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +8.2 percentage points to reach 73.1%. However, Tennessee’s drop in the overall rankings was triggered by stagnation across real-world speed test quality metrics. In M-Labs evaluations, median upload speeds dipped by -2.4 Mbps down to 24.3 Mbps and median round-trip latency increased slightly to 34.2 ms, offsetting a modest download speed gain to 129.2 Mbps.
North Carolina
Ranked #34 of 51 ▲ 2 · 2026 State Profile
78.1
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
92.1% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
85.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
56.4% |
| Median download |
|
177.5 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
22.8 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
23.2 ms |
North Carolina (#34 – Score: 78.1 | Grade: C+) moves up two positions from #36 in 2025, supported by expanding fiber-optic coverage and a dramatic surge in consumer download speeds. Over the past year, the Tar Heel State increased its fiber footprint by +8.1 percentage points to cover 56.4% of the population, while expanding baseline wired availability to 92.1% and low-priced plan access to 85.4%. This physical network growth drove significant performance gains across M-Labs dataset evaluations, as median download speeds jumped by +62 Mbps to reach 177.5 Mbps and latency improved to 23.2 ms. However, overall placement remains constrained by a median upload speed of 22.8 Mbps that falls below our 28 Mbps quality threshold.
Kentucky
Ranked #35 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile
78
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
89.9% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
81.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
65.9% |
| Median download |
|
151.2 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
32.8 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
34.9 ms |
Kentucky (#35 – Score: 78.0 | Grade: C+) slips two spots from #33 in 2025, shifting slightly down despite steady infrastructure modernization across the state. Over the past 12 months, Kentucky expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6.9 percentage points to reach 65.9% of residents, while maintaining solid access prerequisites: basic wired availability covers 89.9% of the population and low-priced broadband plans reach 81.9%. Real-world speed test evaluations reflected solid download progress, with median download speeds increasing by +39.8 Mbps to hit 151.2 Mbps alongside upload speeds of 32.8 Mbps. However, Kentucky’s overall ranking is held back by a median round-trip latency of 34.9 ms that trails regional peers.
Alabama
Ranked #36 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile
77.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
88.0% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
79.6% |
| Fiber availability |
|
57.1% |
| Median download |
|
139.5 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
35.0 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
34.4 ms |
Alabama (#36 – Score: 77.5 | Grade: C+) advances three positions from #39 in 2025, driven by rapid fiber network expansion and improving consumer speed metrics. Over the past year, the Yellowhammer State increased its fiber-optic availability by +8.4 percentage points to reach 57.1% of residents, while growing basic wired coverage to 88% and low-priced plan access to 79.6%. This buildout generated noticeable quality improvements across M-Labs speed evaluations: median download speeds surged by +28.7 Mbps to hit 139.5 Mbps and upload speeds climbed by +10.7 Mbps to reach a robust 35 Mbps. Alabama’s upward trajectory was moderated slightly by an increase in median round-trip latency, which rose from 29 ms to 34.4 ms.
Mississippi
Ranked #37 of 51 ▼ 2 · 2026 State Profile
77.3
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
89.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
78.2% |
| Fiber availability |
|
65.9% |
| Median download |
|
114.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
40.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
28.6 ms |
Mississippi (#37 – Score: 77.3 | Grade: C) slips two positions from #35 in 2025, yet stands out as one of the nation’s fastest-growing infrastructure markets. Over the past 12 months, the Magnolia State delivered massive prerequisite gains, expanding basic wired or fixed wireless availability by +7.4 percentage points to reach 89.8% of residents while growing low-priced plan access to 78.2%. Physical infrastructure also advanced rapidly, with fiber-optic coverage surging by +10.6 percentage points to hit 65.9%. This deployment drove elite upload performance across M-Labs evaluations, where median upload speeds reached 40.5 Mbps alongside downloads of 114.3 Mbps and a stable round-trip latency of 28.6 ms.
Georgia
Ranked #38 of 51 ▼ 14 · 2026 State Profile
76.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
88.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
62.5% |
| Median download |
|
110.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
23.2 ms |
Georgia (#38 – Score: 76.9 | Grade: C) registers a sharp regression in our 2026 rankings, tumbling -14 positions down from #24 in 2025 despite strong baseline availability. The Peach State maintains solid prerequisite access metrics, providing 94.8% of residents with basic wired coverage, 88.5% with low-priced plan options, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +7.7 percentage points to reach 62.5%. However, Georgia’s drop in the standings was triggered by stagnation across real-world speed test evaluations relative to rapidly accelerating peers. In M-Labs dataset testing, median upload speeds remained flat at 23.7 Mbps (below our 28 Mbps passing threshold) and round-trip latency worsened from 20.5 ms up to 23.2 ms, offsetting a modest download gain to 110.9 Mbps.
West Virginia
Ranked #39 of 51 ▲ 7 · 2026 State Profile
74.7
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
79.3% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
68.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
36.2% |
| Median download |
|
186.1 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
32.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
19.8 ms |
West Virginia (#39 – Score: 74.7 | Grade: C) climbs +7 spots upward from #46 in 2025, making significant strides in overcoming historical topographic deployment challenges. Over the past year, the Mountain State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +7.3 percentage points to reach 36.2% of the population, while growing basic wired availability by +5 percentage points to hit 79.3%. This network modernization triggered massive performance improvements across M-Labs evaluations: median download speeds surged by +69 Mbps to reach an impressive 186.1 Mbps, upload speeds rose to 32.5 Mbps, and round-trip latency improved by -5.5 ms down to a responsive 19.8 ms. Further growth is capped primarily by an affordability gap where low-priced plans reach 68.8% of residents.
South Carolina
Ranked #40 of 51 ▼ 20 · 2026 State Profile
73.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.6% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
87.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
58.3% |
| Median download |
|
151.1 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
18.6 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
31.8 ms |
South Carolina (#40 – Score: 73.9 | Grade: C) experienced the steepest regression in our 2026 evaluation, falling -20 positions down from #20 in 2025. While the Palmetto State actually expanded basic wired availability to 95.6% and increased fiber-optic penetration by +8.8 percentage points to hit 58.3%, its real-world quality metrics deteriorated sharply relative to regional peers. In our evaluation of M-Labs speed test datasets, South Carolina’s median round-trip latency worsened from 25.9 ms down to 31.8 ms, while median upload speeds fell by -3.2 Mbps (landing at 18.6 Mbps), severely penalizing its scaled performance score. Combined with an affordability tier where 87.1% of residents can access low-priced plans, this performance drop caused the state to fall behind rapidly accelerating telecom markets.
Wisconsin
Ranked #41 of 51 — vs 2025 · 2026 State Profile
73.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
89.6% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
72.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
47.4% |
| Median download |
|
132.8 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
20.2 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
18.4 ms |
Wisconsin (#41 – Score: 73.2 | Grade: C) holds steady at #41 in our 2026 standings, making significant strides in basic availability while continuing to face affordability and speed challenges. Over the past year, the Badger State expanded its wired or fixed wireless broadband access by a robust +6.5 percentage points, bringing baseline coverage to 89.6% of residents alongside a 47.4% fiber-optic footprint (up +7.6% from 2025). However, overall ranking progress is restrained by an affordability prerequisite where low-priced broadband plans reach just 72% of the population. In M-Labs speed evaluations, median download speeds improved by +21 Mbps to hit 132.8 Mbps and latency sat at 18.4 ms, but median upload speeds lagged at 20.2 Mbps.
Ohio
Ranked #42 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile
72.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.4% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
85.9% |
| Fiber availability |
|
49.7% |
| Median download |
|
142.5 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
15.6 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
30.5 ms |
Ohio (#42 – Score: 72.9 | Grade: C) slips four positions from #38 in 2025, shifting down the standings despite robust baseline coverage and expanding fiber networks. The Buckeye State provides strong access prerequisites, covering 94.4% of residents with basic wired availability and 85.9% with budget-friendly low-priced plans. While physical infrastructure grew over the past year, with fiber-optic coverage adding +7.6 percentage points to reach 49.7% and download speeds rising to 142.5 Mbps, Ohio was heavily penalized by its upload speed quality mapping. In M-Labs dataset evaluations, Ohio generated a median upload speed of just 15.6 Mbps (a -2 Mbps YoY decline) alongside a round-trip latency of 30.5 ms.
Arizona
Ranked #43 of 51 ▼ 6 · 2026 State Profile
72.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.5% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
83.8% |
| Fiber availability |
|
31.4% |
| Median download |
|
117.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
19.5 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
24.3 ms |
Arizona (#43 – Score: 72.2 | Grade: C-) drops six positions from #37 in 2025, experiencing a slowdown in real-world network performance relative to national benchmarks. The Grand Canyon State maintains a strong baseline availability prerequisite, covering 94.5% of residents with basic wired service and 83.8% with low-priced broadband plan options. Over the past 12 months, Arizona expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +6.7 percentage points to reach 31.4% of the population. However, consumer speed test evaluations revealed performance bottlenecks: while median download speeds increased to 117.3 Mbps, median upload speeds dipped by -2.1 Mbps down to 19.5 Mbps alongside a round-trip latency of 24.3 ms.
Oregon
Ranked #44 of 51 ▼ 18 · 2026 State Profile
71.9
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
92.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
81.5% |
| Fiber availability |
|
51.8% |
| Median download |
|
107.2 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.6 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
25.4 ms |
Oregon (#44 – Score: 71.9 | Grade: C-) experiences one of the sharpest declines in our 2026 report, tumbling -18 positions down from #26 in 2025. While the Beaver State maintained solid basic wired coverage at 92.8% and expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +5.8 percentage points to hit 51.8%, its regression was driven by deteriorating affordability and latency metrics. Over the past year, low-priced plan availability dropped by -3.2 percentage points down to 81.5%, penalizing its heavily weighted prerequisite score. Simultaneously, M-Labs speed evaluations revealed a sharp degradation in network responsiveness, as median round-trip latency worsened from 18.2 ms up to 25.4 ms, offsetting modest download (107.2 Mbps) and upload speeds (23.6 Mbps).
New Mexico
Ranked #45 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile
69.5
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
90.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
76.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
25.3% |
| Median download |
|
104.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.8 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
20.7 ms |
New Mexico (#45 – Score: 69.5 | Grade: D+) slips one spot from #44 in 2025, continuing to face geographic deployment barriers and a contracting affordability baseline. While basic wired or fixed wireless availability held steady at 90.2%, access to budget-friendly low-priced plans fell by -4 percentage points year-over-year down to 76.1%. Over the past 12 months, New Mexico expanded its fiber-optic footprint by +6.2 percentage points to reach 25.3% of residents, remaining among the lower fiber density markets in the country. Across M-Labs speed evaluations, consumer quality metrics showed modest progress, with median download speeds reaching 104.4 Mbps, upload speeds rising to 23.8 Mbps, and round-trip latency improving slightly to 20.7 ms.
Wyoming
Ranked #46 of 51 ▲ 3 · 2026 State Profile
68.3
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
88.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
70.2% |
| Fiber availability |
|
42.9% |
| Median download |
|
137.3 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
23.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
32.3 ms |
Wyoming (#46 – Score: 68.3 | Grade: D+) climbs three positions from #49 in 2025, making significant progress in modernizing its physical network architecture across vast rural distances. Over the past year, the Equality State delivered an impressive fiber rollout, surging fiber-optic availability by +13.8 percentage points to reach 42.9% of residents alongside an 88.2% basic wired coverage baseline. This deployment helped narrow the state’s historical affordability gap, lifting low-priced plan availability by +4.5 percentage points up to 70.2%. In M-Labs speed test evaluations, consumer performance improved dramatically: median download speeds jumped by +45.1 Mbps to reach 137.3 Mbps and round-trip latency improved by -8.2 ms down to 32.3 ms, though upload speeds hovered at 23.7 Mbps.
Hawaii
Ranked #47 of 51 ▼ 4 · 2026 State Profile
66.7
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
95.2% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
95.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
74.6% |
| Median download |
|
86.5 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
16.3 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
98.8 ms |
Hawaii (#47 – Score: 66.7 | Grade: D) drops four positions from #43 in 2025, illustrating a profound separation between high physical infrastructure density and geographic performance limits. As an island chain, Hawaii achieves outstanding access prerequisites, providing 95.2% of residents with basic wired availability, 95.1% with budget-friendly low-priced plans, and expanding its fiber-optic footprint by +11.4 percentage points to reach a massive 74.6%. However, because our methodology assigns 30% of its total weight to M-Labs speed test quality, Hawaii is severely penalized by physical distance to mainland server infrastructure. The state recorded the highest median latency in America at 98.8 ms, alongside lower median download (86.5 Mbps) and upload speeds (16.3 Mbps).
Kansas
Ranked #48 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile
63.7
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
94.5% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
77.4% |
| Fiber availability |
|
74.6% |
| Median download |
|
58.4 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
17.9 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
25.5 ms |
Kansas (#48 – Score: 63.7 | Grade: D) slips one spot from #47 in 2025, remaining a prime example of our methodology’s “Fiber Paradox”, where extensive fiber infrastructure does not automatically yield top-tier consumer speed tests. Over the past year, the Sunflower State expanded its fiber-optic service footprint by +11.1 percentage points to reach 74.6% of residents alongside 94.5% basic wired availability and 77.4% low-priced plan access. Despite this top-10 fiber penetration, Kansas ranked lowest nationwide in M-Labs download speed evaluations, recording a median download speed of just 58.4 Mbps alongside a median upload speed of 17.9 Mbps and a round-trip latency of 25.5 ms.
Idaho
Ranked #49 of 51 ▼ 1 · 2026 State Profile
63.2
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
91.8% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
73.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
41.8% |
| Median download |
|
101.9 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
19.6 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
29.9 ms |
Idaho (#49 – Score: 63.2 | Grade: D) slips one position from #48 in 2025, continuing to face challenges in rural infrastructure scaling and affordability tier distribution. Over the past 12 months, the Gem State made positive strides in physical deployment, expanding basic wired coverage by +4.3 percentage points to 91.8% and growing its fiber-optic footprint by +11.1 percentage points to reach 41.8% of the population. However, overall placement remains severely restricted by a low-priced plan availability rate of just 73%. In real-world speed evaluations, consumer download speeds progressed to 101.9 Mbps and latency improved to 29.9 ms, but median upload speeds remained stagnant at 19.6 Mbps.
Montana
Ranked #50 of 51 — vs 2025 · 2026 State Profile
51.4
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
83.0% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
53.0% |
| Fiber availability |
|
33.8% |
| Median download |
|
104.2 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
16.1 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
39.2 ms |
Montana (#50 – Score: 51.4 | Grade: F) holds steady at #50 in our 2026 evaluation, remaining a significant mathematical outlier separated from the rest of the nation by severe affordability and deployment gaps. While basic wired or fixed wireless availability grew by +4.7 percentage points over the past year to reach 83%, nearly half of the state’s population remains priced out of budget tiers, with low-priced plan availability covering just 53% of residents. Fiber-optic infrastructure saw modest growth, adding +5.6 percentage points to reach 33.8% coverage. Across M-Labs evaluations, median download speeds progressed to 104.2 Mbps, but overall quality was heavily penalized by a median upload speed of 16.1 Mbps and a round-trip latency of 39.2 ms.
Alaska
Ranked #51 of 51 — vs 2025 · Largest affordability gap in US
27.6
Overall / 100
| Access |
|
76.7% |
| Low-priced plan access |
|
0.1% |
| Fiber availability |
|
14.7% |
| Median download |
|
49.6 Mbps |
| Median upload |
|
13.7 Mbps |
| Latency (RTT) |
|
53.3 ms |
Alaska (#51 – Score: 27.6 | Grade: F) ranks #51 as the lowest-performing region for broadband in 2026, generating an overall score that represents an extreme statistical outlier. Defined by vast geographic barriers and isolation from mainland networks, Alaska’s standing is anchored by a complete absence of affordable connectivity: while 76.7% of residents have basic wired or fixed wireless access, only 0.1% have access to low-priced broadband tiers. Because our scoring framework assigns a 30% weight to low-priced plan availability as an essential prerequisite, this cost barrier makes service practically out of reach for much of the population. Fiber-optic penetration remains scarce at 14.7%, and while M-Labs speed test evaluations showed median speeds of 49.6 Mbps download and 13.7 Mbps upload, geographic separation resulted in a high median latency of 53.3 ms.
Policy Recommendations for State Broadband
1. Make affordability a condition, not an afterthought.
The states at the bottom of our rankings don’t primarily suffer from missing infrastructure; they suffer from unaffordable infrastructure. With ACP gone, BEAD’s low-cost service option requirement is the last major federal affordability lever. States should enforce it rigorously and publish plan pricing data so compliance is verifiable.
2. Judge networks by outcomes, not technology.
The 2025 restructuring of BEAD made the program technology-neutral. Our fiber paradox findings suggest that’s defensible, but only if performance standards are enforced. Whether a household is served by fiber, cable, fixed wireless, or satellite, the questions that matter are the ones we measure: real-world speed, latency, and price.
3. Treat uploads as first-class infrastructure.
8 states still post median uploads below the FCC’s 20 Mbps floor, and upload weakness was the common thread among this year’s biggest rank declines. Remote work, cloud storage, telehealth, and video communication have made upstream capacity a daily-life necessity. State broadband offices should weight upload performance accordingly in their grant scoring.
4. Watch consolidation in thin markets.
A shrinking provider count is not inherently bad, but in rural counties with one or two options, every exit matters. Merger review and subgrant awards should account for local, not national, market concentration.
Methodology
We score each state based on several weighted categories:
Category weights
Wired low-priced access 30%
Median RTT latency 10%
Median download speed 10%
Median upload speed 10%
Fiber-optic access 5%
Access
To assess internet access, we look at three metrics: access to wired or fixed wireless broadband internet, access to low-priced broadband internet, and access to fiber-optic service.
The first two access metrics are the most highly weighted elements in our methodology (making up 65% of the total score) because they both serve as a prerequisite for anything else. If broadband internet is only available to a select few, or if it is so cost prohibitive that only a few can use it, then the quality would be of considerably less importance.
We also consider access to fiber-optic service because it is the fastest and most reliable internet technology available today.
Quality
To assess internet quality, we analyzed download speed, upload speed, and round trip time, which is a measure of latency. Depending on what you use the internet for, any one of those three metrics could be the most important thing to you.
People who play a lot of online competitive video games may consider latency to be the most important, a live streamer or business owner might prioritize upload speed, while an everyday user who mostly uses the internet for watching streaming services could be most interested in download speeds. You can use our bandwidth calculator to find out what’s right for you.
We analyzed over 160 million speed tests from the M-Labs NDT Data Set between January 1st and June 15th, 2026 for their upload speed, download speed, and round trip time.
Scoring
We gave every state a score from 0 to 100 for each of the six categories, and then weighted and added them together to get a final score from 0 to 100.
The three access categories are percentages that already range from 0 to 100, so we did not modify those for their score.
We calculated the three quality categories by linearly mapping each state’s median speed to a scale from 0 to 100. For each metric, we set the speed which corresponds to a score of 100 and 59 (RTT: 10 ms and 20 ms; download: 130 Mbps and 110 Mbps; upload: 35 Mbps and 28 Mbps), and we scaled the intermediate values proportionally.
Looking Ahead: The Build-Out Begins
This is the last edition of this report that will describe a pre-BEAD America. With nearly every state’s final proposal now federally approved, award agreements signed, and construction beginning across dozens of states in 2026, the next several editions of this study will measure whether $42+ billion in public investment actually moves the numbers that matter. Our findings suggest what to watch:
- Affordability, not availability, is the binding constraint in the lowest-ranked states. BEAD’s low-cost option requirements will matter as much as its construction milestones.
- The performance bar is rising fast, as networks built to yesterday’s standards will be obsolete on delivery.
- Rural states need tailored solutions, with the Alaska problem presenting a pricing problem, not an engineering problem.
- Consolidation bears watching, as meaningful choice, not provider counts, drives good consumer outcomes.
The 2026 rankings tell a story of genuine, measurable progress, and of a stubborn economic divide that speed alone cannot close. The states that pair fast networks with affordable plans dominate the top of our rankings. Until that combination reaches the bottom of the list, the digital divide will remain very much open.
About This Study
BroadbandNow Research produces comprehensive analyses of America’s broadband landscape to inform policymakers, journalists, and consumers. Our 2026 Best and Worst States study continues our commitment to data-driven insights that advance the goal of universal connectivity. Our 2026 Best and Worst Cities for Broadband study is also another pillar in our mission to point out these infrastructural differences across the nation.
For more information, data requests, or media inquiries, visit broadbandnow.com/research.
How to cite this report
BroadbandNow Research. “The Best and Worst States for Broadband 2026.” [PUBLICATION DATE] 2026.
Need more data or expert commentary?
Our research team can provide custom data cuts, state-level breakdowns, and expert commentary for your story. Reach us at press@broadbandnow.com.