Internet Providers in Marks, Mississippi
Enter a zip code to find broadband in your area.
Internet Statistics for Marks, MS
Providers: | 7 |
---|---|
Max Advertised Speed: | 1,000 Mbps |
Fiber: | Available |
Cable: | Available |
DSL: | Available |
Most Popular Residential Internet Providers in Marks, Mississippi
Internet Access in Marks, Mississippi
Marks has only two major broadband network choices: coaxial cable (73.02% coverage) and DSL (84.05% availability). Coaxial cable Internet is generally provided by cable TV corporations, using their pre-existing coaxial copper television wires mounted on utility poles or buried in the street. DSL, similarly, is delivered via twisted copper phone wires. Most Marks neighborhoods and census blocks can access both cable and DSL from two alternating ISPs.
Viasat Internet (formerly Exede) and HughesNet are the most common Internet options in Marks.
Broadband competition for residents of the Marks area is strong. The average home has 3-4 providers to choose from. Access isn't distributed fairly, however. A notable 15.91 percent of the population still only have one option.
Remember that since FCC data is only processed biannually and only released six or more months after that, availability shown here may not be complete.
Aside from the Internet options listed above, AT&T Internet is another option to consider. They have Internet in 80 percent of the Marks area. Wireless options are available in the area. However, wired providers virtually always offer stronger pricing for the download speed. The majority of Marks residents have access to wired broadband.
- There are 10 internet providers in Marks with 7 of those offering residential service
- Marks is the 168th most connected city in Mississippi ahead of Lambert, Crenshaw, Tutwiler, and Courtland, but behind Clarksdale.
Internet Statistics 2021
15.9% of consumers in Marks
400 People Only have access to 1 or fewer wired internet providers available at their address.This data is calculated from FCC datasets which providers are legally required to supply twice a year. We further validate this data for accuracy.
Are you a journalist or researcher writing about this topic?
Contact us and we'll connect you with a broadband market expert on our team who can provide insights and data to support your work.
Summary Of Fastest Internet Providers In Marks, Mississippi
Provider | Speed | Type | Time To Download 1 GB |
---|---|---|---|
Sparklight (formerly Cable One) | 1,000 Mbps | Cable | 8s |
C Spire Fiber | 1,000 Mbps | Fiber | 8s |
Viasat Internet (formerly Exede) | 50 Mbps | Satellite | 2m 43s |
HughesNet | 25 Mbps | Satellite | 5m 27s |
AT&T Internet | 100 Mbps | DSL and Fixed Wireless | 1m 21s |
Summary of Internet Providers Availability in Marks, Mississippi
- AT&T Internet - 80.7% Availability in Marks - Speeds up to 100 Mbps
- Sparklight - 73.0% Availability in Marks - Speeds up to 1,000 Mbps
- C Spire Fiber - 39.9% Availability in Marks - Speeds up to 1,000 Mbps
- Viasat - 100.0% Availability in Marks - Speeds up to 50 Mbps
- HughesNet - 100.0% Availability in Marks - Speeds up to 25 Mbps
Internet Providers in Nearby Cities
Internet Provider Competition Map For Marks

The “Connected” metric is a citywide average based on FCC data showing the density of broadband options at the census block level.
This statistic is drawn from the population in census blocks not served by at least one wired broadband provider.
Fiber coverage data is sourced from FCC Form 477 filings and cross-validated through BroadbandNow with private datasets and direct provider reporting.
This coverage statistic is based on a mix of FCC and private provider reporting in the past two quarters.
25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload is the minimum speed for an Internet connection to be classified as “Broadband” by the FCC.
Data Cap Issues and Cord Cutting Around Marks
Data from our market researchers suggests that common providers in Marks use data caps on home Internet plans. Data caps are disliked since subscribers see caps as a strategy for limiting "cord cutting", while providers insist they are a necessary strategy as they struggle to manage network congestion. Either way, the culprit is the same: streaming video, which can consume 1–7GB per hour.